brain and nerve = shinkei kenkyu no shinpo | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2366 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

brain and nerve = shinkei kenkyu no shinpo

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name brain nerve
Abbreviated Name brain nerve
ISSN 1881-6096
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (37 total)

2019
[Support for Patients and Their Family Using Artificial Intelligence].
Kondo, Izumi;Ozaki, Kenichi;Osawa, Aiko;
Vol. 71 , No. 7 , pp. 759-764
364 views DOI Abstract
2016
techniques of assisted human reproduction and the problematic of parental liability
;Carlos Alexandre Moraes;Marta Beatriz Tanaka Ferdinandi
Vol. 1 , No. 7 , pp. 94-121
297 views Abstract
2019
[A Skilled Typist with Typing Disorder Following Resection of a Left Frontal Lobe Tumor].
Wakamatsu, Kazuhiro;Ishiai, Sumio;Saito, Hidekazu;
Vol. 71 , No. 10 , pp. 1097-1103
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Artificial Intelligence-based Drug Discovery and Drug Repositioning].
Tanaka, Hiroshi;
Vol. 71 , No. 9 , pp. 981-989
274 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Drug Repositioning for Alzheimer's Disease].
Ihara, Masafumi;Saito, Satoshi;
Vol. 71 , No. 9 , pp. 961-970
252 views DOI Abstract
2016
justicia ambiental y desarrollo: un diálogo posible?
;Letícia Albuquerque
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 131-146
243 views Abstract
2018
What is the Core Symptom and Neural Mechanism of Asperger Syndrome? From Our Ten Years of Clinical Observation of Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Ohta, H.
Vol. 70 , pp. 1225-1236
233 views DOI
2016
sociedad de la información, crímenes y derechos humanos frente a los países centrales y periféricos
;Celso Antonio Pacheco Fiorillo;Greice Patricia Fuller
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 201-220
231 views Abstract
2016
harmonisation of the use of sacrificial animals by candomblé with the protection of animals
;Patrícia da Costa Santana
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 34-66
208 views Abstract
2016
la gente de kamba en la frontera entre brasil y bolivia : un estudio jurídico sobre derechos humanos violaciónes
;Antônio Hilário Aguilera Urquiza;Luciani Coimbra de Carvalho
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 8-25
199 views Abstract
View All 37 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.