asia pacific journal of clinical nutrition | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4303 / 33,986
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
41
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

asia pacific journal of clinical nutrition

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name asia pac j clin nutr
Abbreviated Name asia pac j clin nutr
ISSN 1440-6047
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

Association of energy intake and physical activity with overweight among Indonesian children 6-12 years of age.
Harahap, Heryudarini;Sandjaja, Sandjaja;Soekatri, Moesijanti;Khouw, Ilse;Deurenberg, Paul;
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 211-216
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of nutritional status on length of stay and hospital costs among patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Thailand.
Bhirommuang, Nuttapimon;Komindr, Surat;Jayanama, Kulapong;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 252-259
398 views DOI Abstract
Diets for South Asians with diabetes: recommendations, adherence, and outcomes.
Kasturia, Shirin;Ali, Mohammed K;Narayan, K M Venkat;Tandon, Nikhil;Shivashankar, Roopa;Garg, Vandana;Kapoor, Deksha;Mohanasundaram, Anitha;Mohan, Deepa;Kadir, Muhammad M;Prabhakaran, Dorairaj;Mohan, Viswanathan;Jaacks, Lindsay M;
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 823-831
393 views DOI Abstract
2019
Infant feeding practices in relation to iron status and other possible nutritional deficiencies in Pathumthani, Thailand.
Thaweekul, Patcharapa;Surapolchai, Pacharapan;Sinlapamongkolkul, Phakatip;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 577-583
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of blood eosinophilia and vitamin D insufficiency in young infants with cow milk allergy.
Li, Jingwen;Mei, Xiaoli;Cai, Xinyi;Zhuo, Yujie;Zhang, Lanfang;Guo, Hongmei;Yang, Hui;Yang, Guang;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 550-557
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Riceberry rice puddings: rice-based low glycemic dysphagia diets.
Suttireung, Prangtip;Winuprasith, Thunnalin;Srichamnong, Warangkana;Paemuang, Wannaporn;Phonyiam, Tawaree;Trachootham, Dunyaporn;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 467-475
355 views DOI Abstract
2016
The effect of socio-demographic variables and dairy use on the intake of essential macro- and micronutrients in 0.5-12-year-old Indonesian children.
Widodo, Yekti;Sandjaja, Sandjaja;Sumedi, Edith;Khouw, Ilse;Deurenberg, Paul;
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 356-67
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying appropriate pre-pregnancy body mass index classification to improve pregnancy outcomes in women of childbearing age in Beijing, China: a retrospective cohort study.
Zhao, Rui-Fen;Zhou, Li;Zhang, Wei-Yuan;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 567-576
336 views DOI Abstract
2006
Diet and nutritional status of adolescent tribal population in nine states of India.
Rao, Kodavanti Mallikharjuna;Balakrishna, Nagalla;Laxmaiah, Avula;Venkaiah, Kodali;Brahmam, G N V;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 64-71
335 views Abstract
2019
Sugars and sweeteners: science, innovations, and consumer guidance for Asia.
Drewnowski, Adam;Tappy, Luc;Forde, Ciaran G;McCrickerd, Keri;Tee, E Siong;Chan, Pauline;Amin, Latifah;Trinidad, Trinidad P;Amarra, Maria Sofia;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 645-663
326 views DOI Abstract
View All 16 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
32
15
30
40
41
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

40.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.