human-centric computing and information sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6867 / 33,980
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

human-centric computing and information sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name human-centric computing and information sciences
Abbreviated Name human-centric computing and information sciences
ISSN 2192-1962
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2017
An AmI-based and privacy-preserving shopping mall model
Blundo, Carlo;Orciuoli, Francesco;Parente, Mimmo;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-28
677 views Abstract
2017
Improving the interactive genetic algorithm for customer-centric product design by automatically scoring the unfavorable designs
Darani, Zahra Sheikhi;Kaedi, Marjan;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
667 views Abstract
2018
A multi-hop graph-based approach for an energy-efficient routing protocol in wireless sensor networks
Rhim, Hana;Tamine, Karim;Abassi, Ryma;Sauveron, Damien;Guemara, Sihem;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-21
560 views Abstract
2017
A collaborative approach for semantic time-based video annotation using gamification
Viana, Paula;Pinto, José Pedro;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-21
553 views Abstract
2020
Intelligent video interview agent used to predict communication skill and perceived personality traits
Suen, H.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
363 views DOI
2019
Correction to: Detection and classification of social media-based extremist affiliations using sentiment analysis techniques (Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, (2019), 9, 1, (24), 10.1186/s13673-019-0185-6)
Ahmad, S.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
363 views DOI
2020
A blockchain-based smart home gateway architecture for preventing data forgery
Lee, Y.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
305 views DOI
2019
Hybrid case-base maintenance approach for modeling large scale case-based reasoning systems
Khan, M.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
293 views DOI
2020
A deep learning approach for pressure ulcer prevention using wearable computing
Cicceri, G.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
272 views DOI
2019
Research paper classification systems based on TF-IDF and LDA schemes
Kim, S.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
265 views DOI
View All 11 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.