science and engineering ethics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#507 / 33,940
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

science and engineering ethics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name sci eng ethics
Abbreviated Name sci eng ethics
ISSN 1471-5546
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/11948
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (43 total)

2019
Towards Higher Moral and Economic Goals in Renewable Energy.
Škapa, Stanislav;Vochozka, Marek;
369 views DOI Abstract
2018
The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity.
Howard, Ayanna;Borenstein, Jason;
Vol. 24 , No. 5 , pp. 1521-1536
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Distinguishing Characteristics of Corruption Risks in Iranian Construction Projects: A Weighted Correlation Network Analysis.
Hosseini, M Reza;Martek, Igor;Banihashemi, Saeed;Chan, Albert P C;Darko, Amos;Tahmasebi, Mahdi;
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Solving the Single-Vehicle Self-Driving Car Trolley Problem Using Risk Theory and Vehicle Dynamics.
Davnall, Rebecca;
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Facing the Pariah of Science: The Frankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists.
Nagy, Peter;Wylie, Ruth;Eschrich, Joey;Finn, Ed;
328 views DOI Abstract
2013
Patenting and the gender gap: should women be encouraged to patent more?
de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada;
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 491-504
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions?
Martin, Dominic;
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 951-967
322 views DOI Abstract
2005
Ethics in an operations management course.
Rudnicka, Ewa A;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 645-54
305 views Abstract
2012
entorno institucional y comercio exterior: el efecto del riesgo político en las exportaciones de castilla y león = institutional aspects and foreign trade: results of political risk in exports
;Alfredo Jiménez Palmero
, No. 14 , pp. 53-69
293 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rescuing Informed Consent: How the new "Key Information" and "Reasonable Person" Provisions in the Revised U.S. Common Rule open the door to long Overdue Informed Consent Disclosure Improvements and why we need to walk Through that door.
Yarborough, Mark;
291 views DOI Abstract
View All 43 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.