journal of biomolecular nmr | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5665 / 33,972
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of biomolecular nmr

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name j biomol nmr
Abbreviated Name j biomol nmr
ISSN 1573-5001
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2019
Using Deep Neural Networks to Reconstruct Non-uniformly Sampled NMR Spectra.
Hansen, D Flemming;
422 views DOI Abstract
2007
caroline lang, john reeve and vicky woollard (eds), the responsive museum: working with audiences in the twenty-first century
;Graham Black
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 128-130
308 views
2005
'a whole new world': the young person's experience of visiting sydney technological museum
;Megan Hicks
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 66-80
239 views Abstract
2004
‘fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in european natural history museums
;Anders Høg Hansen;Theano Moussouri
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 161-174
231 views Abstract
2014
doing emotion work in museums: reconceptualising the role of community engagement practitioners
;Ealasaid Munro
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 44-60
230 views Abstract
2006
popping the museum: the cases of sheffield and preston
;Tara Brabazon;Stephen Mallinder
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 96-112
219 views Abstract
2009
multiplying sites of sovereignty through community and constituent services at the national museum of the american indian?
;Kylie Message
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 50-67
210 views Abstract
2012
natasha vall, cultural region. north east england, 1945–2000
;Kelly J. Gannon
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 145-147
206 views
2009
museums as conflict zones: the canadian war museum and bomber command
;David Dean
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
205 views Abstract
2005
museums, nation and political history in the australian national museum and the canadian museum of civilization
;David Dean;Peter E Rider
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 35-50
195 views Abstract
View All 19 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.