Journal of the American Heart Association | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1430 / 33,940
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Journal of the American Heart Association

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name J Am Heart Assoc
Abbreviated Name j am heart assoc
ISSN 2047-9980
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.ahajournals.org/journal/jaha
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (266 total)

2020
Early Systolic Lengthening in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Novel Predictor of Cardiovascular Events.
Brainin, Philip;Haahr-Pedersen, Sune;Olsen, Flemming Javier;Holm, Anna Engell;Fritz-Hansen, Thomas;Jespersen, Thomas;Gislason, Gunnar;Biering-Sørensen, Tor;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. e013835
536 views DOI Abstract
2015
stability of runge-kutta methods for neutral delay differential equations
;Liping Wen;Xiong Liu;Yuexin Yu
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
531 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Cancer and Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Deng, Yuqing;Tong, Yifan;Deng, Yuanyuan;Zou, Le;Li, Shunhui;Chen, Hui;
Vol. 8 , No. 14 , pp. e012540
523 views DOI Abstract
2018
Gender Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.
Okunrintemi, Victor;Valero-Elizondo, Javier;Patrick, Benjamin;Salami, Joseph;Tibuakuu, Martin;Ahmad, Saba;Ogunmoroti, Oluseye;Mahajan, Shiwani;Khan, Safi U;Gulati, Martha;Nasir, Khurram;Michos, Erin D;
Vol. 7 , No. 24 , pp. e010498
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Systems Network Genomic Analysis Reveals Cardioprotective Effect of MURC/Cavin-4 Deletion Against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury.
Nishi, Masahiro;Ogata, Takehiro;Cannistraci, Carlo Vittorio;Ciucci, Sara;Nakanishi, Naohiko;Higuchi, Yusuke;Sakamoto, Akira;Tsuji, Yumika;Mizushima, Katsura;Matoba, Satoaki;
Vol. 8 , No. 15 , pp. e012047
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cardiovascular Outcomes Associated With Clinical Use of Citalopram and Omeprazole: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
Wu, Wen-Tung;Tsai, Chun-Teng;Chou, Yu-Ching;Ku, Po-Ming;Chen, Yong-Chen;You, San-Lin;Hung, Chi-Feng;Sun, Chien-An;
Vol. 8 , No. 20 , pp. e011607
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Types of Sedentary Behavior and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Blacks: The Jackson Heart Study.
Garcia, Jeanette M;Duran, Andrea T;Schwartz, Joseph E;Booth, John N;Hooker, Steven P;Willey, Joshua Z;Cheung, Ying Kuen;Park, Chorong;Williams, Stephen K;Sims, Mario;Shimbo, Daichi;Diaz, Keith M;
Vol. 8 , No. 13 , pp. e010406
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.
Delesalle, Geraud;Bohbot, Yohann;Rusinaru, Dan;Delpierre, Quentin;Maréchaux, Sylvestre;Tribouilloy, Christophe;
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. e011036
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Highlights From the American Heart Association's EPI|LIFESTYLE 2019 Scientific Sessions.
Alonso, Alvaro;Anderson, Madison D;Bancks, Michael P;Brown, Sherry-Ann;Caughey, Melissa C;Chang, Alex R;Delker, Erin;Foti, Kathryn;Gingras, Véronique;Nanna, Michael G;Razavi, Alexander C;Scott, Jewel;Selvin, Elizabeth;Tcheandjieu, Catherine;Thomas, Alvin G;Turkson-Ocran, Ruth-Alma N;Webel, Allison;Young, Deborah R;DeBarmore, Bailey M;
Vol. 8 , No. 11 , pp. e012925
349 views DOI
2019
Role of Big Data in Cardiovascular Research.
Weintraub, William S;
Vol. 8 , No. 14 , pp. e012791
311 views DOI
View All 266 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.