Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6250 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw
Abbreviated Name cyberpsychol behav soc netw
ISSN 2152-2723
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2012
efficacy of submucosal sodium tetradecyl sulfate in the soft palate as a treatment of the mild obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a pilot study
;Alberto Labra;Reyes Haro-Valencia;Angel-Daniel Huerta-Delgado;Ulises Jimenez-Correa;Francisco Sanchez-Narvaez
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Psychological Effects of Exergames for Children and Adolescents with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Andrade, Alexandro;Correia, Clara Knierim;Coimbra, Danilo Reis;
Vol. 22 , No. 11 , pp. 724-735
391 views DOI Abstract
2012
clinical features and polysomnographic findings in greek male patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: differences regarding the age
;Efremidis George;Varela Katerina;Spyropoulou Maria;Beroukas Lambros;Nikoloutsou Konstantina;Georgopoulos Dimitrios
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
378 views DOI Abstract
2018
Problematic Video Gaming in a Young Spanish Population: Association with Psychosocial Health.
Buiza-Aguado, Carlos;Alonso-Canovas, Araceli;Conde-Mateos, Celia;Buiza-Navarrete, Juan Jose;Gentile, Douglas;
Vol. 21 , No. 6 , pp. 388-394
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association Between Mothers' Problematic Internet Use and the Thinness of Their Children.
Sakakihara, Aya;Haga, Chiyori;Osaki, Yoneatsu;
Vol. 22 , No. 9 , pp. 578-587
361 views DOI Abstract
2015
Underage Use of Social Network Sites: It's About Friends.
Barbovschi, Monica;Macháčková, Hana;Ólafsson, Kjartan;
Vol. 18 , No. 6 , pp. 328-32
356 views DOI Abstract
2015
residual effects of sleep medications are commonly reported and associated with impaired patient-reported outcomes among insomnia patients in the united states
;Timothy Fitzgerald;Jeffrey Vietri
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
311 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Mediating Effect of Information and Communication Technology Usages on the Nexus Between Assistive Technology and Quality of Life Among People with Communication Disability.
Ali, Mohammad Afshar;Alam, Khorshed;Taylor, Brad;
Vol. 23 , No. 5 , pp. 338-345
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction to: by Kim A, Cho M, Ahn J, and Sung Y. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22(4):249-253. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0581.
Vol. 22 , No. 7 , pp. 512
297 views DOI
2015
My Friends Right Next to Me: A Laboratory Investigation on Predictors and Consequences of Experiencing Social Closeness on Social Networking Sites.
Neubaum, German;Krämer, Nicole C;
Vol. 18 , No. 8 , pp. 443-9
285 views DOI Abstract
View All 28 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.