Indexed in Journament

international journal of audiology

ISSN 1708-8186· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.8/100
Journament Score
#6,866
Journament Rank
14
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name int j audiol
Abbreviated Name int j audiol
ISSN 1708-8186

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2019
Hearing aid or "band aid"? Evaluating large scale hearing aid donation programmes in the Philippines.
Newall, John;Biddulph, Rohan;Ramos, Hubert;Kwok, Catherine;
, pp. 1-10
488 views DOI Abstract
2019
Herpes zoster does not increase the risk of sudden sensory neural hearing loss: a longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort.
Kim, So Young;Lee, Chang-Ho;Min, Chanyang;Kim, Hyung-Jong;Choi, Hyo Geun;
, pp. 1-6
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy intervention for tinnitus using behavioural measures and structural MRI: a pilot study.
Husain, Fatima T;Zimmerman, Benjamin;Tai, Yihsin;Finnegan, Megan K;Kay, Emily;Khan, Faaiza;Menard, Christopher;Gobin, Robyn L;
Vol. 58 , No. 12 , pp. 889-901
383 views DOI Abstract
2017
Perspectives of Dutch health professionals regarding auditory processing disorders; a focus group study.
Neijenhuis, Karin;de Wit, Ellen;Luinge, Margreet;
Vol. 56 , No. 12 , pp. 942-950
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
ForwardFocus with cochlear implant recipients in spatially separated and fluctuating competing signals - introduction of a reference metric.
Hey, Matthias;Hocke, Thomas;Böhnke, Britta;Mauger, Stefan J;
, pp. 1-10
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
The P300 auditory event-related potential as a method to assess the benefit of contralateral hearing aid use in bimodal listeners: a proof-of-concept.
Van Yper, Lindsey N;Dhooge, Ingeborg J M;Vermeire, Katrien;De Vel, Eddy F J;Beynon, Andy J;
, pp. 1-8
356 views DOI Abstract
2017
The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor.
De Ceulaer, Geert;Pascoal, David;Vanpoucke, Filiep;Govaerts, Paul J;
Vol. 56 , No. 11 , pp. 837-843
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Literature overview on P3 measurement as an objective measure of auditory performance in post-lingually deaf adults with a cochlear implant.
Jacquemin, Laure;Mertens, Griet;Schlee, Winfried;Van de Heyning, Paul;Gilles, Annick;
, pp. 1-8
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Detection of hearing problems in Aboriginal and Torres strait islander children: a comparison between clinician-administered and self-administrated hearing tests.
Mealings, Kiri;Harkus, Samantha;Flesher, Brooke;Meyer, Alea;Chung, King;Dillon, Harvey;
, pp. 1-9
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
The World Health Organization’s hearing-impairment grading system: an evaluation for unaided communication in age-related hearing loss
Humes, L.
Vol. 58 , pp. 12-20
311 views DOI
2020
Detection of hearing problems in Aboriginal and Torres strait islander children: a comparison between clinician-administered and self-administrated hearing tests.
Mealings, Kiri;Harkus, Samantha;Flesher, Brooke;Meyer, Alea;Chung, King;Dillon, Harvey;
, pp. 1-9
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy intervention for tinnitus using behavioural measures and structural MRI: a pilot study.
Husain, Fatima T;Zimmerman, Benjamin;Tai, Yihsin;Finnegan, Megan K;Kay, Emily;Khan, Faaiza;Menard, Christopher;Gobin, Robyn L;
Vol. 58 , No. 12 , pp. 889-901
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
The World Health Organization’s hearing-impairment grading system: an evaluation for unaided communication in age-related hearing loss
Humes, L.
Vol. 58 , pp. 12-20
311 views DOI
2019
Qualitative research methods to investigate communication within a group aural rehabilitation intervention
Coco, L.
Vol. 58 , pp. 651-660
223 views DOI
2019
Adults who report difficulty hearing speech in noise: an exploration of experiences, impacts and coping strategies.
Pang, Jermy;Beach, Elizabeth Francis;Gilliver, Megan;Yeend, Ingrid;
, pp. 1-10
284 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hearing aid or "band aid"? Evaluating large scale hearing aid donation programmes in the Philippines.
Newall, John;Biddulph, Rohan;Ramos, Hubert;Kwok, Catherine;
, pp. 1-10
488 views DOI Abstract
2019
Herpes zoster does not increase the risk of sudden sensory neural hearing loss: a longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort.
Kim, So Young;Lee, Chang-Ho;Min, Chanyang;Kim, Hyung-Jong;Choi, Hyo Geun;
, pp. 1-6
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Consensus practice parameter: audiological assessment and management of unilateral hearing loss in children.
Bagatto, Marlene;DesGeorges, Janet;King, Alison;Kitterick, Padraig;Laurnagaray, Diana;Lewis, Dawna;Roush, Patricia;Sladen, Douglas P;Marie Tharpe, Anne;
, pp. 1-11
207 views DOI Abstract
2019
The P300 auditory event-related potential as a method to assess the benefit of contralateral hearing aid use in bimodal listeners: a proof-of-concept.
Van Yper, Lindsey N;Dhooge, Ingeborg J M;Vermeire, Katrien;De Vel, Eddy F J;Beynon, Andy J;
, pp. 1-8
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Literature overview on P3 measurement as an objective measure of auditory performance in post-lingually deaf adults with a cochlear implant.
Jacquemin, Laure;Mertens, Griet;Schlee, Winfried;Van de Heyning, Paul;Gilles, Annick;
, pp. 1-8
342 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.