Indexed in Journament

clinical kidney journal

ISSN 2048-8505· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,207 of 33,995 indexed journals
121 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name clin kidney j
Abbreviated Name clin kidney j
ISSN 2048-8505

Publications Per Year

Articles (121)

2020
The role of patient portals in enhancing self-care in patients with renal conditions.
Hazara, Adil M;Durrans, Katherine;Bhandari, Sunil;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Trends of renal diseases in Germany: review of a regional renal biopsy database from 1990 to 2013.
Zink, Corinna M;Ernst, Sabine;Riehl, Jochen;Helmchen, Udo;Gröne, Hermann-Josef;Floege, Jürgen;Schlieper, Georg;
Vol. 12 , No. 6 , pp. 795-800
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel insights into parathyroid hormone: report of The Parathyroid Day in Chronic Kidney Disease.
Ureña-Torres, Pablo A;Vervloet, Marc;Mazzaferro, Sandro;Oury, Franck;Brandenburg, Vincent;Bover, Jordi;Cavalier, Etienne;Cohen-Solal, Martine;Covic, Adrian;Drüeke, Tilman B;Hindié, Elif;Evenepoel, Pieter;Frazão, João;Goldsmith, David;Kazama, Junichiro James;Cozzolino, Mario;Massy, Ziad A;, ;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 269-280
326 views DOI Abstract
2012
Magnesium basics
Willi Jahnen‐Dechent, Markus Ketteler
42 views DOI Abstract
2026
Long-term B-cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing, refractory and severe lupus nephritis: a retrospective case series
Qiyu Wang, Orhan Efe, Ayman Al Jurdi, Harish Seethapathy, Reza Zonozi, Gabriel Sauvage, Karen Laliberte, John Niles, Anushya Jeyabalan
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
#CKDatWork screening for CKD in occupational health
Amelie Gienapp, Laura Niebling, Tobias Peter, Bernd Hohenstein, R Wendt, Cristina Popa, Miriam C. Banas, Jan T Kielstein
21 views DOI
2026
Creatinine Muscle Index in UK Biobank: Comparison with MRI and associations with Frailty and Mortality
Giada Azzopardi, Thomas Davies, Myles J Lewis, Zudin Puthucheary, John R Prowle
20 views DOI Abstract
2026
Lifestyle intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk in kidney transplant recipients: the KT-LIFESTYLE multicentre randomized controlled trial
Valentina Totti, Gaia Tabanelli, Michele Stecchi, Lucia Brodosi, Valeria Grandinetti, Valeria Pizzuti, Paola E. D'Intino, Daniele Ferrarini, Eleonora Capelli, Rocco Di Michele, Giovanni Mosconi, Vittorio Albertazzi, Erika Cordella, Patrizia Brigidi, Maria Cristina Morelli, Gaetano La Manna, Giuseppe Tarantino
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Environmental Footprint of Peritoneal Dialysis in Europe: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Across Four European Centres
Abass Fehintola, Zuzanna Jakubowska, Małgorzata Kępska-Dzilińska, J M Jolanta Malyszko, A A F Crooijmans, Ootjers Thomas, James Larkin, Giulia Ligabue, Gaetano Alfano, G Donati, Rodrigo MartínezCadenas, Aycan Yasar, Belén Sanz, M Gonzalez de Rivera, Lucia Cordero, Julia Audije-Gil, María Dolores Arenas, Ingeborg Steinbach, Marta Arias, Alberto Ortiz, K G F Gerritsen, Brett Duane
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Randomised clinical trial of the kidney health 4 life (KH4L) self-management program
Kelly Lambert, Maria O’Sullivan, Karen M. Dwyer, Marijka Batterham, Breonny Robson
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
What is the best dialysis regimen for severe AKI to allow kidney function recovery?
Yu‐Ting Chou, Charles Jun Han Ng, Vin‐Cent Wu, Д. В. Соколов, Turgay Saritas, Marlies Ostermann
DOI Abstract
2026
PRO/CON debate: non-steroidal versus steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in chronic kidney disease: progress, pragmatism, and remaining uncertainties
Rajiv Agarwal, Liffert Vogt, J. Floege, Carmine Zoccali
DOI Abstract
2026
Finerenone in asian patients with diabetic kidney disease: evaluating the evidence for “better efficacy”
Siqian Gong, Linong Ji
DOI Abstract
2026
Causal relationships between gut microbiota, metabolites, and chronic kidney disease: a two-step, two-sample Mendelian randomization study
Yingzhe Qian, Yue Yang, Ziyan Shen, Han Zhang, Jing Chen, Cheng Zhu, Jie Teng, Xiaogang Du
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Treatment with CFTR modulators and subsequent remission of AA amyloidosis
Rachel McDougall, Christopher Hill
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Immune Monitoring by Torque Teno Virus Load in Addition to Virus-Specific T Cells After Pediatric Kidney Transplantation
David Nehl, Xiaofei Liu, Sebastian Voigt, Carina Elsner, Raphael Schild, Jun Oh, Christina Taylan, Lutz T. Weber, Nele Kanzelmeyer, Gregor Bond, Stefanie Jeruschke, Nils Pape, Anika Großhennig, Lars Pape, Thurid Ahlenstiel-Grunow
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Long-term kidney and patient outcomes in pure versus mixed lupus membranous nephritis
Martina Uzzo, Marco Bracalenti, Marta Calatroni, Barbara Trezzi, Emanuele Conte, Laura Locatelli, Mariele Gatto, Roberto Depascale, Giovanni Maria Rossi, Vincenzo L’Imperio, R Sinico, Andrea Doria, Gabriella Moroni
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Implementing nurse-led, multi-disciplinary, cardio-kidney-metabolic care in an integrated community care program for fluid overload in CKD and heart failure
Cynthia Ciwei Lim, Hooi Khee Teo, Stephanie Swee Hong Teo, Hairil Rizal Bin Abdullah, Shan Yin Audry Lee
3 views DOI
2026
Endothelial biomarkers predict kidney and cardiovascular outcomes after acute kidney injury
Giovana Seno Di Marco, Katrin Beul, Eike Bormann, Hermann Pavenstädt, Marcus Brand
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Tailoring KDIGO guidelines for lupus nephritis to the real world: a stratified and cost-aware approach
Savino Sciascia, Brad H. Rovin, Jürgen Floege
2 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,207 of 33,995
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.