Indexed in Journament

medicine, health care, and philosophy

ISSN 1572-8633· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #6,063 of 33,995 indexed journals
4 Articles
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name med health care philos
Abbreviated Name med health care philos
ISSN 1572-8633

Publications Per Year

Articles (4)

2019
A gap between the philosophy and the practice of palliative healthcare: sociological perspectives on the practice of nurses in specialised palliative homecare.
Glasdam, Stinne;Ekstrand, Frida;Rosberg, Maria;van der Schaaf, Ann-Margrethe;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is it ever morally permissible to select for deafness in one's child?
Wallis, Jacqueline Mae;
Vol. 23 , pp. 3-15
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
To die well: the phenomenology of suffering and end of life ethics.
Svenaeus, Fredrik;
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
All in the family.
Gordijn, Bert;Have, Henk Ten;
313 views DOI
2020
All in the family.
Gordijn, Bert;Have, Henk Ten;
313 views DOI
2019
Is it ever morally permissible to select for deafness in one's child?
Wallis, Jacqueline Mae;
Vol. 23 , pp. 3-15
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
A gap between the philosophy and the practice of palliative healthcare: sociological perspectives on the practice of nurses in specialised palliative homecare.
Glasdam, Stinne;Ekstrand, Frida;Rosberg, Maria;van der Schaaf, Ann-Margrethe;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
To die well: the phenomenology of suffering and end of life ethics.
Svenaeus, Fredrik;
342 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #6,063 of 33,995
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

93.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.