27th annual international pittsburgh coal conference 2010, pcc 2010 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1883 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

27th annual international pittsburgh coal conference 2010, pcc 2010

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name 27th annual international pittsburgh coal conference 2010, pcc 2010
Abbreviated Name 27th annual international pittsburgh coal conference 2010, pcc 2010
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2010
Fixed-bed adsorption of carbon dioxide-nitrogen mixtures onto activated carbon: Characteristics of CO<inf>2</inf> adsorption and modeling
Moreira R.
Vol. 3 , pp. 2332-2343
256 views
2014
do blind ending vas deferens and testicular vessels on inguinal exploration always indicate a vanishing testis?
;Mete Kaya;Esra Ozcakir;Serpil Sancar
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 1-7
246 views DOI Abstract
2014
self-insertion of needle as urethral foreign body after sexual gratification: an unusual case report
;Metin Tahaoglu;Serkan Ozturk;Hayrettin Ozturk
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 10-14
245 views DOI Abstract
2018
uretero-appendicular fistula: a rare case mimicking ureterolithiasis in a child
;Julian O. Galvis-Angulo;Sandra Milena Rueda-Quijano;Natalie Estefania Pinto-Briceño;Angie Lucía Méndez-Zaraza;Bernardo Santamaría-Fuerte;Armando J. Lorenzo;Victor H. Figueroa
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 84-88
208 views DOI Abstract
2016
complete separation of the testis and epididymis in an undescendedtestis: a case report
;Ryuta Watanabe;Takeshi Sugahara;Hitoshi Hamada
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 42-45
191 views DOI Abstract
2018
a new variant of urethral duplication- collateral urethral duplication with paraspadiac meatus: a case report
;Prashant Mulawkar;Parag Tapre;Utpala Mulawkar;Deepak Bhat
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 22-27
175 views DOI Abstract
2014
penile rotation and penoscrotal transposition associated with hypospadias and bifid scrotum: a case report
;Hayrettin Ozturk;Serkan Ozturk
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 5-9
174 views DOI Abstract
2014
the relationship between the localization and etiology in children’s penile tourniquet syndrome: a case report and literature review
;Mustafa Yasar Ozdamar;Kursad Zengin;Serhat Tanik;Sebahattin Albayrak;Adnan Gucuk;Mesut Gurdal
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 16-20
167 views DOI Abstract
2016
anterior urethral valve, a rare cause of bilateral vesicoureteral reflux in a two year old boy: a case report and a review of the literature
;Amit Sharma;Radhyeshyam Chaudhari;Mukund Andankar
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 56-62
151 views DOI Abstract
2014
nonoperative treatment of blunt renal trauma with urinary extravasation in a child
;Serpil Sancar;Cagatay Aydiner;Mete Kaya
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 12-17
137 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.