zhongguo dianji gongcheng xuebao/proceedings of the chinese society of electrical engineering | Journament

Journal Ranking

#981 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

zhongguo dianji gongcheng xuebao/proceedings of the chinese society of electrical engineering

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name zhongguo dianji gongcheng xuebao/proceedings of the chinese society of electrical engineering
Abbreviated Name zhongguo dianji gongcheng xuebao/proceedings of the chinese society of electrical engineering
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2012
perceived control, academic performance and well-being of ghanaian college students with disability
;Frances E. Owusu-Ansah;Peter Agyei-Baffour;Anthony Edusei
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
392 views DOI Abstract
2017
people with disabilities and income-related social protection measures in south africa: where is the gap?
;Jill Hanass-Hancock;Tamlyn C. McKenzie
Vol. 6 , pp. e1-e11
384 views DOI Abstract
2016
living with disabled children in malawi: challenges and rewards
;Grete Barlindhaug;Eric Umar;Margaret Wazakili;Nina Emaus
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
377 views DOI Abstract
2017
the long-term impact of wheelchair delivery on the lives of people with disabilities in three countries of the world
;Susan Shore
Vol. 6 , pp. e1-e8
325 views DOI Abstract
2017
development and evaluation of a wheelchair service provision training of trainers programme
;Sara Munera;Mary Goldberg;Krithika Kandavel;Jonathan Pearlman
Vol. 6 , pp. e1-e13
269 views DOI Abstract
2017
exploring structural violence in the context of disability and poverty in zimbabwe
;Jennifer T. Muderedzi;Arne H. Eide;Stine H. Braathen;Babill Stray-Pedersen
Vol. 6 , pp. e1-e9
249 views DOI Abstract
2017
‘these are not luxuries, it is essential for access to life’: disability related out-of-pocket costs as a driver of economic vulnerability in south africa
;Jill Hanass-Hancock;Siphumelele Nene;Nicola Deghaye;Simmi Pillay
Vol. 6 , pp. e1-e10
248 views DOI Abstract
2012
the implementation of inclusive education in south africa: reflections arising from a workshop for teachers and therapists to introduce universal design for learning
;Elizabeth M. Dalton;Judith A. Mckenzie;Callista Kahonde
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e7
238 views DOI Abstract
2010
Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of NO removal on activated carbons
Yin Y.
Vol. 30 , pp. 49-54
232 views
2013
barriers to and facilitators of rehabilitation services for people with physical disabilities: a systematic review
;Nondwe B. Mlenzana;Jose M. Frantz;Anthea J. Rhoda;Arne H. Eide
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
226 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.