Indexed in Journament

European journal of medical genetics

ISSN 1878-0849· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #6,462 of 20,553 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
7 Articles
Scores higher than 68.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Eur J Med Genet
Abbreviated Name eur j med genet
ISSN 1878-0849

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for European journal of medical genetics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.0
Accessibility 15.0 19.8
Timeliness 50.0 39.2
Diversity 30.0 30.0
Innovation 40.0 36.9
Community Impact 32.5 26.4
Content Distribution 93.4 85.3
Content Quality 54.2
Ethics & Transparency 39.5
Editorial Standards 32.5
Publication Regularity 51.6
Geographic Reach 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (7)

2019
Clinical outcomes after the transfer of blastocysts characterized as mosaic by high resolution Next Generation Sequencing- further insights.
, pp. 103741
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
A successful treatment of tadalafil in incontinentia pigmenti with pulmonary hypertension.
, pp. 103764
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
A longitudinal perspective on the pharmacotherapy of 24 adult patients with Phelan McDermid syndrome.
, pp. 103751
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Possible dual contribution of a novel GUCY2D mutation in the development of retinal degeneration in a consanguineous population.
, pp. 103750
304 views DOI Abstract
2022
A novel POLD1 pathogenic variant identified in two families with a cancer spectrum mimicking Lynch syndrome.
Vol. 65 , No. 2 , pp. 104409
246 views DOI Abstract
2022
A novel POLD1 pathogenic variant identified in two families with a cancer spectrum mimicking Lynch syndrome.
Vol. 65 , No. 2 , pp. 104409
246 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical outcomes after the transfer of blastocysts characterized as mosaic by high resolution Next Generation Sequencing- further insights.
, pp. 103741
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
A successful treatment of tadalafil in incontinentia pigmenti with pulmonary hypertension.
, pp. 103764
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Possible dual contribution of a novel GUCY2D mutation in the development of retinal degeneration in a consanguineous population.
, pp. 103750
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
A longitudinal perspective on the pharmacotherapy of 24 adult patients with Phelan McDermid syndrome.
, pp. 103751
329 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #6,462 of 20,553 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

93.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.