Indexed in Journament

indian journal of anaesthesia

ISSN 0019-5049· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.0/100
Journament Score
#8,962
Journament Rank
17
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name indian j anaesth
Abbreviated Name indian j anaesth
ISSN 0019-5049

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2016
Maternal and foetal outcome after epidural labour analgesia in high-risk pregnancies
Vol. 60 , No. 2 , pp. 115-120
479 views Abstract
2018
A randomised controlled study of the post-operative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block in the first 24 h after modified radical mastectomy
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 436-442
451 views Abstract
2019
A radiological inquest to determine the destiny of ultrasound guided trans-muscular quadratus lumborum plane catheters.
Vol. 63 , No. 8 , pp. 667-670
420 views DOI Abstract
2012
Echo-guided estimation of formula for paravertebral block in neonates, infants and children till 5 years
Vol. 56 , No. 4 , pp. 382-386
374 views Abstract
2009
Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labour: Effect of Addition of Background Infusion on Quality of Analgesia & Maternal Satisfaction
Vol. 53 , No. 6 , pp. 649-653
333 views Abstract
2019
Is COMBIPECS the answer to perioperative analgesia for breast surgery? A double blinded randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 63 , No. 7 , pp. 530-536
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
The 2019 novel corona virus outbreak - An institutional guideline
Vol. 64 , pp. 242-243
189 views DOI
2019
Scientometrics in medical journals: Indices, their pros and cons.
Vol. 63 , No. 11 , pp. 955-957
258 views DOI
2019
A radiological inquest to determine the destiny of ultrasound guided trans-muscular quadratus lumborum plane catheters.
Vol. 63 , No. 8 , pp. 667-670
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is COMBIPECS the answer to perioperative analgesia for breast surgery? A double blinded randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 63 , No. 7 , pp. 530-536
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pectoral nerve versus erector spinae block for breast surgeries: A randomised controlled trial.
Vol. 63 , No. 8 , pp. 617-622
126 views DOI Abstract
2018
guild patterns of basidiomycetes community associated with quercus mongolica in mt. jeombong, republic of korea
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 13-23
251 views DOI Abstract
2018
A randomised controlled study of the post-operative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block in the first 24 h after modified radical mastectomy
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 436-442
451 views Abstract
2018
Undiagnosed intraoperative methaemoglobinaemia
Vol. 62 , No. 1 , pp. 72-74
168 views Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.