tecnologia del agua | Journament

Journal Ranking

#656 / 33,934
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

tecnologia del agua

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name tecnologia del agua
Abbreviated Name tecnologia del agua
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (149 total)

2014
population dynamics of lepidoptera pests in eucalyptus urophylla plantations in the brazilian amazonia
;José Cola Zanuncio;Pedro Guilherme Lemes;Germi Porto Santos;Marcus Alvarenga Soares;Carlos Frederico Wilcken;José Eduardo Serrão
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 72-87
310 views DOI Abstract
2014
governing forest landscape restoration: cases from indonesia
;Cora van Oosten;Petrus Gunarso;Irene Koesoetjahjo;Freerk Wiersum
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 1143-1162
305 views DOI Abstract
2016
attribution analyses of impacts of environmental changes on streamflow and sediment load in a mountainous basin, vietnam
;Jie Wang;Ishidaira Hiroshi;Shaowei Ning;Timur Khujanazarov;Guiping Yin;Lijuan Guo
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 30-
291 views DOI Abstract
2014
effects of a wildfire on selected physical, chemical and biochemical soil properties in a pinus massoniana forest in south china
;Li Xue;Qiujing Li;Hongyue Chen
Vol. 5 , No. 12 , pp. 2947-2966
284 views DOI Abstract
2017
structure from motion (sfm) photogrammetry with drone data: a low cost method for monitoring greenhouse gas emissions from forests in developing countries
;Reason Mlambo;Iain H. Woodhouse;France Gerard;Karen Anderson
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 68-
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
soil co2 efflux and root productivity in a switchgrass and loblolly pine intercropping system
;Paliza Shrestha;John R. Seiler;Brian D. Strahm;Eric B. Sucre;Zakiya H. Leggett
Vol. 7 , No. 10 , pp. 221-
260 views DOI Abstract
2014
total stem and merchantable volume equations of norway spruce (picea abies (l.) karst.) growing on former farmland in sweden
;Tord Johansson
Vol. 5 , No. 8 , pp. 2037-2049
260 views DOI Abstract
2015
adaptation of leaf water relations to climatic and habitat water availability
;Patrick J. Mitchell;Anthony P. O'Grady
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 2281-2295
257 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluation of the susceptibility of several czech conifer provenances to fusarium circinatum
;Jorge Martín-García;Aneta Lukačevičová;Juan Asdrúbal Flores-Pacheco;Julio Javier Diez;Miloň Dvořák
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 72-
256 views DOI Abstract
2011
modeling effects of climate change and fire management on western white pine (pinus monticola) in the northern rocky mountains, usa
;Robert E. Keane;Rachel A. Loehman;Jason A. Clark
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 832-860
253 views DOI Abstract
View All 149 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.