Indexed in Journament

journal of cataract and refractive surgery

ISSN 1873-4502· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,061 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 82.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j cataract refract surg
Abbreviated Name j cataract refract surg
ISSN 1873-4502

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 13.6
Content Distribution 75.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity — 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 13.6 7.8
Content Distribution 75.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2020
Eckardt keratoprosthesis for combined pars plana vitrectomy and therapeutic keratoplasty in a patient with endophthalmitis and suppurative keratitis.
Kim, Seong Ho;Kim, Na Rae;Chin, Hee Seung;Jung, Ji Won;
595 views DOI Abstract
1993
Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in patients with early cataracts
Chylack LT;Jakubicz G;Rosner B;Khu P;Libman J;Wolfe JK;Padhye N;Friend J;;
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. -
517 views Abstract
2009
Influence of induced decentered orthokeratology lens on ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations and contrast sensitivity function
Hiraoka T;Mihashi T;Okamoto C;Okamoto F;Hirohara Y;Oshika T;;
Vol. 35 , No. 11 , pp. -
429 views Abstract
2013
Contrast sensitivity basics and a critique of currently available tests
Richman J;Spaeth GL;Wirostko B;;
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. -
411 views Abstract
2020
Clinical factors affecting operating room utilization in cataract surgery: Results from the PCIOL study.
McKay, K Matthew;Borkar, Durga S;Moustafa, Giannis A;Haviland, Miriam J;Kloek, Carolyn E;, ;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 14-19
378 views DOI Abstract
2018
Intraoperative optical coherence tomography measurements of aphakic eyes to predict postoperative position of 2 intraocular lens designs.
Hirnschall, Nino;Farrokhi, Sanaz;Amir-Asgari, Sahand;Hienert, Julius;Findl, Oliver;
Vol. 44 , No. 11 , pp. 1310-1316
374 views DOI Abstract
1997
Photographic image analysis system of posterior capsule opacification.
Tetz, M R;Auffarth, G U;Sperker, M;Blum, M;Völcker, H E;
Vol. 23 , No. 10 , pp. 1515-20
364 views Abstract
2019
Blue light-filtering and violet light-filtering hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses: Intraindividual comparison
Nakano S;Miyata A;Kizawa J;Kurosaka D;Miyata K;Oshika T;;
Vol. 45 , No. 10 , pp. -
341 views Abstract
2020
Axial length measurement and detection rates using a swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer in the presence of a dense vitreous hemorrhage.
Prof, Qinmei Wang;Huang, Yingying;Gao, Rongrong;Chen, Hao;Song, Benhao;Tu, Ruixue;Prof, Yune Zhao;McAlinden, Colm;Huang, Jinhai;
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
Biologic stromal ring to manage stromal melting after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation.
Jarade, Elias;Issa, Mohamad;Chanbour, Wassef;Warhekar, Pramod;
Vol. 45 , No. 9 , pp. 1222-1225
329 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinical factors affecting operating room utilization in cataract surgery: Results from the PCIOL study.
McKay, K Matthew;Borkar, Durga S;Moustafa, Giannis A;Haviland, Miriam J;Kloek, Carolyn E;, ;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 14-19
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
DLK Associated with Table-top Autoclave Biofilms: Case Series and Review.
Sorenson, Andrew L;Holland, Simon;Tran, Kathy;Evans, David J;Lin, Meng C;Mamalis, Nick;Chang, David F;
180 views DOI Abstract
2020
Axial length measurement and detection rates using a swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer in the presence of a dense vitreous hemorrhage.
Prof, Qinmei Wang;Huang, Yingying;Gao, Rongrong;Chen, Hao;Song, Benhao;Tu, Ruixue;Prof, Yune Zhao;McAlinden, Colm;Huang, Jinhai;
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
Eckardt keratoprosthesis for combined pars plana vitrectomy and therapeutic keratoplasty in a patient with endophthalmitis and suppurative keratitis.
Kim, Seong Ho;Kim, Na Rae;Chin, Hee Seung;Jung, Ji Won;
595 views DOI Abstract
2020
Anterior chamber lens sizing: Comparison of white-to-white and scleral spur-to-scleral spur methods.
Bruner, Cameron;Skanchy, David F;Wooten, John P;Chuang, Alice Z;Kim, Gene;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 95-101
210 views DOI Abstract
2019
role of capacity in understanding organizational change in national sports federations
;Gobikas Mindaugas;Čingienė Vilma
Vol. 82 , No. 1 , pp. 13-23
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Blue light-filtering and violet light-filtering hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses: Intraindividual comparison
Nakano S;Miyata A;Kizawa J;Kurosaka D;Miyata K;Oshika T;;
Vol. 45 , No. 10 , pp. -
341 views Abstract
2019
Biologic stromal ring to manage stromal melting after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation.
Jarade, Elias;Issa, Mohamad;Chanbour, Wassef;Warhekar, Pramod;
Vol. 45 , No. 9 , pp. 1222-1225
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
An objective scatter index cutoff point as a powerful objective criterion for preoperative nuclear cataract decision-making based on ROC analysis.
Monferrer-Adsuara, Clara;Mata-Moret, Lucía;Castro-Navarro, Verónica;Hernández-Garfella, Marisa;Gracia-García, Alicia;Ortiz-Salvador, Miguel;Remolí-Sargues, Lidia;Cervera-Taulet, Enrique;
248 views DOI Abstract
2018
Intraoperative optical coherence tomography measurements of aphakic eyes to predict postoperative position of 2 intraocular lens designs.
Hirnschall, Nino;Farrokhi, Sanaz;Amir-Asgari, Sahand;Hienert, Julius;Findl, Oliver;
Vol. 44 , No. 11 , pp. 1310-1316
374 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,061 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.