Indexed in Journament

journal of cataract and refractive surgery

ISSN 1873-4502· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.4/100
Journament Score
#8,501
Journament Rank
18
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j cataract refract surg
Abbreviated Name j cataract refract surg
ISSN 1873-4502

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2020
Eckardt keratoprosthesis for combined pars plana vitrectomy and therapeutic keratoplasty in a patient with endophthalmitis and suppurative keratitis.
Kim, Seong Ho;Kim, Na Rae;Chin, Hee Seung;Jung, Ji Won;
570 views DOI Abstract
1993
Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in patients with early cataracts
Chylack LT;Jakubicz G;Rosner B;Khu P;Libman J;Wolfe JK;Padhye N;Friend J;;
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. -
488 views Abstract
2009
Influence of induced decentered orthokeratology lens on ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations and contrast sensitivity function
Hiraoka T;Mihashi T;Okamoto C;Okamoto F;Hirohara Y;Oshika T;;
Vol. 35 , No. 11 , pp. -
399 views Abstract
2013
Contrast sensitivity basics and a critique of currently available tests
Richman J;Spaeth GL;Wirostko B;;
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. -
374 views Abstract
2018
Intraoperative optical coherence tomography measurements of aphakic eyes to predict postoperative position of 2 intraocular lens designs.
Hirnschall, Nino;Farrokhi, Sanaz;Amir-Asgari, Sahand;Hienert, Julius;Findl, Oliver;
Vol. 44 , No. 11 , pp. 1310-1316
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinical factors affecting operating room utilization in cataract surgery: Results from the PCIOL study.
McKay, K Matthew;Borkar, Durga S;Moustafa, Giannis A;Haviland, Miriam J;Kloek, Carolyn E;, ;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 14-19
347 views DOI Abstract
1997
Photographic image analysis system of posterior capsule opacification.
Tetz, M R;Auffarth, G U;Sperker, M;Blum, M;Völcker, H E;
Vol. 23 , No. 10 , pp. 1515-20
341 views Abstract
2019
Blue light-filtering and violet light-filtering hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses: Intraindividual comparison
Nakano S;Miyata A;Kizawa J;Kurosaka D;Miyata K;Oshika T;;
Vol. 45 , No. 10 , pp. -
308 views Abstract
2019
Biologic stromal ring to manage stromal melting after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation.
Jarade, Elias;Issa, Mohamad;Chanbour, Wassef;Warhekar, Pramod;
Vol. 45 , No. 9 , pp. 1222-1225
307 views DOI Abstract
2020
Axial length measurement and detection rates using a swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer in the presence of a dense vitreous hemorrhage.
Prof, Qinmei Wang;Huang, Yingying;Gao, Rongrong;Chen, Hao;Song, Benhao;Tu, Ruixue;Prof, Yune Zhao;McAlinden, Colm;Huang, Jinhai;
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinical factors affecting operating room utilization in cataract surgery: Results from the PCIOL study.
McKay, K Matthew;Borkar, Durga S;Moustafa, Giannis A;Haviland, Miriam J;Kloek, Carolyn E;, ;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 14-19
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
DLK Associated with Table-top Autoclave Biofilms: Case Series and Review.
Sorenson, Andrew L;Holland, Simon;Tran, Kathy;Evans, David J;Lin, Meng C;Mamalis, Nick;Chang, David F;
159 views DOI Abstract
2020
Axial length measurement and detection rates using a swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer in the presence of a dense vitreous hemorrhage.
Prof, Qinmei Wang;Huang, Yingying;Gao, Rongrong;Chen, Hao;Song, Benhao;Tu, Ruixue;Prof, Yune Zhao;McAlinden, Colm;Huang, Jinhai;
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
Eckardt keratoprosthesis for combined pars plana vitrectomy and therapeutic keratoplasty in a patient with endophthalmitis and suppurative keratitis.
Kim, Seong Ho;Kim, Na Rae;Chin, Hee Seung;Jung, Ji Won;
570 views DOI Abstract
2020
Anterior chamber lens sizing: Comparison of white-to-white and scleral spur-to-scleral spur methods.
Bruner, Cameron;Skanchy, David F;Wooten, John P;Chuang, Alice Z;Kim, Gene;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 95-101
175 views DOI Abstract
2019
role of capacity in understanding organizational change in national sports federations
;Gobikas Mindaugas;Čingienė Vilma
Vol. 82 , No. 1 , pp. 13-23
223 views DOI Abstract
2019
Blue light-filtering and violet light-filtering hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses: Intraindividual comparison
Nakano S;Miyata A;Kizawa J;Kurosaka D;Miyata K;Oshika T;;
Vol. 45 , No. 10 , pp. -
308 views Abstract
2019
Biologic stromal ring to manage stromal melting after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation.
Jarade, Elias;Issa, Mohamad;Chanbour, Wassef;Warhekar, Pramod;
Vol. 45 , No. 9 , pp. 1222-1225
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
An objective scatter index cutoff point as a powerful objective criterion for preoperative nuclear cataract decision-making based on ROC analysis.
Monferrer-Adsuara, Clara;Mata-Moret, Lucía;Castro-Navarro, Verónica;Hernández-Garfella, Marisa;Gracia-García, Alicia;Ortiz-Salvador, Miguel;Remolí-Sargues, Lidia;Cervera-Taulet, Enrique;
217 views DOI Abstract
2018
Intraoperative optical coherence tomography measurements of aphakic eyes to predict postoperative position of 2 intraocular lens designs.
Hirnschall, Nino;Farrokhi, Sanaz;Amir-Asgari, Sahand;Hienert, Julius;Findl, Oliver;
Vol. 44 , No. 11 , pp. 1310-1316
353 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.