Indexed in Journament

bmc pregnancy and childbirth

ISSN 1471-2393· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
49.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #107 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
37 Articles
Scores higher than 99.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name bmc pregnancy childbirth
Abbreviated Name bmc pregnancy childbirth
ISSN 1471-2393

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.2
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 88.9
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 14.3
Content Distribution 81.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for bmc pregnancy and childbirth
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 88.9 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 14.3 7.8
Content Distribution 81.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (37)

2009
Causes of death and associated conditions (Codac) – a utilitarian approach to the classification of perinatal deaths
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 22-
553 views Abstract
2010
Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery?: a qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 43-
492 views Abstract
2019
Factors influencing women's decision-making regarding complementary medicine product use in pregnancy and lactation.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 280
488 views DOI Abstract
2018
Provider and client perspectives on maternity care in Namibia: results from two cross-sectional studies
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
486 views Abstract
2015
Soluble receptors for advanced glycation end products and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand serum levels as markers of premature labor.
Vol. 15 , pp. 134
476 views DOI Abstract
2010
Different sex ratios of children born to Indian and Pakistani immigrants in Norway
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 40-
472 views Abstract
2018
Evaluation of a novel vital sign device to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity in low-resource settings: a mixed method feasibility study for the CRADLE-3 trial.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 115
446 views DOI Abstract
2019
A review of surrogate motherhood regulation in south American countries: pointing to a need for an international legal framework.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 46
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence of hyperglycemia in pregnancy and influence of body fat on development of hyperglycemia in pregnancy among pregnant women in urban areas of Arusha region, Tanzania.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 315
426 views DOI Abstract
2021
Struma ovarii and peritoneal strumosis during pregnancy - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
244 views DOI Abstract
2020
Supporting women who develop poor postnatal mental health: what support do fathers receive to support their partner and their own mental health?
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
275 views DOI Abstract
2020
Women’s experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-21
312 views DOI Abstract
2020
Supporting perinatal anxiety in the digital age; a qualitative exploration of stressors and support strategies
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-20
298 views DOI Abstract
2020
Be quiet and man up: a qualitative questionnaire study into fathers who witnessed their Partner’s birth trauma
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
283 views DOI Abstract
2020
Monitoring intrapartum fetal heart rates by mothers in labour in two public hospitals: an initiative to improve maternal and neonatal healthcare in Liberia
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-24
304 views DOI Abstract
2020
Social concerns related to HIV status disclosure and participation in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV care among pregnant women in Kenya.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 225
369 views DOI Abstract
2020
Barriers to maternal retention in HIV care in Ghana: key differences during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 398
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Maternal cardiovascular adaptation to twin pregnancy: a population-based prospective cohort study
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
259 views Abstract
Journament Score
49.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #107 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

49.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

88.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

14.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.