hyperfine interactions | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4584 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

hyperfine interactions

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name hyperfine interactions
Abbreviated Name hyperfine interactions
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

1970
Interplay of surface conditions, particle size, stoichiometry, cell parameters, and magnetism in synthetic hematite-like materials
M.-Z. Dang;D.G. Rancourt;J.E. Dutrizac;G. Lamarche;R. Provencher;M.-Z. Dang;D.G. Rancourt;J.E. Dutrizac;G. Lamarche;R. Provencher;
Vol. 117 , No. 1 , pp. 271-319
375 views DOI Abstract
1970
Magnetic dipolar and electric quadrupolar effects on the Mössbauer spectra of magnetite above the Verwey transition
L. Häggström;H. Annersten;T. Ericsson;R. Wäppling;W. Karner;S. Bjarman;L. Häggström;H. Annersten;T. Ericsson;R. Wäppling;W. Karner;S. Bjarman;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 201-214
370 views DOI Abstract
1970
Mössbauer characterization of iron oxides and (oxy)hydroxides: the present state of the art
R.E. Vandenberghe;C.A. Barrero;G.M. da Costa;E. Van San;E. De Grave;R.E. Vandenberghe;C.A. Barrero;G.M. da Costa;E. Van San;E. De Grave;
Vol. 126 , No. 1 , pp. 247-259
341 views DOI Abstract
1970
On the methodology of the analysis of Mössbauer spectra
R. E. Vandenberghe;E. De Grave;P. M. A. de Bakker;R. E. Vandenberghe;E. De Grave;P. M. A. de Bakker;
Vol. 83 , No. 1 , pp. 29-49
337 views DOI Abstract
1970
The effect of the particle morphology on the Mössbauer effect in αFe 2 O 3
A. E. Verbeeck;E. De Grave;R. E. Vandenberghe;A. E. Verbeeck;E. De Grave;R. E. Vandenberghe;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 639-642
333 views DOI Abstract
1990
Some aspects concerning the characterization of iron oxides and hydroxides in soils and clays
R. E. Vandenberghe;E. De Grave;C. Landuydt;L. H. Bowen;R. E. Vandenberghe;E. De Grave;C. Landuydt;L. H. Bowen;
Vol. 53 , No. 1 , pp. 175-195
330 views DOI Abstract
1970
Evidence from Mössbauer spectroscopy of neo-formation of magnetite/maghemite in the soils of loess/paleosol sequences in China
R.E. Vandenberghe;J.J. Hus;E. De Grave;R.E. Vandenberghe;J.J. Hus;E. De Grave;
Vol. 117 , No. 1 , pp. 359-369
321 views DOI Abstract
1970
Maghemite in basalt studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy in external magnetic field
ö. Helgason;H. P. Gunnlaugsson;S. Steinthorsson;C. Bender Koch;S. MØrup;ö. Helgason;H. P. Gunnlaugsson;S. Steinthorsson;C. Bender Koch;S. MØrup;
Vol. 91 , No. 1 , pp. 583-587
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design of a multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer for barium-tagging
Murray, K.
Vol. 240 , pp. 0-0
234 views DOI
2020
Reuse of Fe-based amorphous alloys containing CRM: study on their temperature behavior
Cherkezova-Zheleva, Z.
Vol. 241 , pp. 0-0
202 views DOI
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.