Indexed in Journament

bmc palliative care

ISSN 1472-684X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1/100
Journament Score
#11,466
Journament Rank
8
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name bmc palliat care
Abbreviated Name bmc palliat care
ISSN 1472-684X

Indexings

ncbi doaj ulakbim sci soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2019
Table in the corner: a qualitative study of life situation and perspectives of the everyday lives of oesophageal cancer patients in palliative care.
Laursen, Louise;Schønau, Mai Nanna;Bergenholtz, Heidi Maria;Siemsen, Mette;Christensen, Merete;Missel, Malene;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 60
831 views DOI Abstract
2010
Collaboration between physicians and a hospital-based palliative care team in a general acute-care hospital in Japan
Mariko, Nishikitani;Masayo, Kashiwakgi;Mikako, Okuno;Nanako, Tamiya;Etsuko, Aruga;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 13-
491 views Abstract
2019
Context, mechanisms and outcomes in end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia: family carers perspective.
Kupeli, Nuriye;Sampson, Elizabeth L;Leavey, Gerard;Harrington, Jane;Davis, Sarah;Candy, Bridget;King, Michael;Nazareth, Irwin;Jones, Louise;Moore, Kirsten;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 87
412 views DOI Abstract
2017
Can digital stories go where palliative care research has never gone before? A descriptive qualitative study exploring the application of an emerging public health research method in an indigenous palliative care context
Williams, L.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
369 views DOI
2019
Consensus on treatment for residents in long-term care facilities: perspectives from relatives and care staff in the PACE cross-sectional study in 6 European countries.
Ten Koppel, M;Pasman, H R W;van der Steen, J T;van Hout, H P J;Kylänen, M;Van den Block, L;Smets, T;Deliens, L;Gambassi, G;Froggatt, K;Szczerbińska, K;Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B D;, ;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 73
361 views DOI Abstract
2020
Unmet needs of patients with cancer in their last year of life as described by caregivers in a developing world setting: a qualitative study.
Cox-Seignoret, Karen;Maharaj, Rohan G;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 13
333 views DOI Abstract
2017
folklore studies on birth related customs within the banat community
;Alexin Otilia Daniela
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 40-49
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
When is hastened death considered suicide? A systematically conducted literature review about palliative care professionals' experiences where assisted dying is legal.
Gerson, Sheri Mila;Bingley, Amanda;Preston, Nancy;Grinyer, Anne;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 75
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Unmet needs of patients with cancer in their last year of life as described by caregivers in a developing world setting: a qualitative study.
Cox-Seignoret, Karen;Maharaj, Rohan G;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 13
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
Context, mechanisms and outcomes in end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia: family carers perspective.
Kupeli, Nuriye;Sampson, Elizabeth L;Leavey, Gerard;Harrington, Jane;Davis, Sarah;Candy, Bridget;King, Michael;Nazareth, Irwin;Jones, Louise;Moore, Kirsten;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 87
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
When is hastened death considered suicide? A systematically conducted literature review about palliative care professionals' experiences where assisted dying is legal.
Gerson, Sheri Mila;Bingley, Amanda;Preston, Nancy;Grinyer, Anne;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 75
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Table in the corner: a qualitative study of life situation and perspectives of the everyday lives of oesophageal cancer patients in palliative care.
Laursen, Louise;Schønau, Mai Nanna;Bergenholtz, Heidi Maria;Siemsen, Mette;Christensen, Merete;Missel, Malene;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 60
831 views DOI Abstract
2019
Consensus on treatment for residents in long-term care facilities: perspectives from relatives and care staff in the PACE cross-sectional study in 6 European countries.
Ten Koppel, M;Pasman, H R W;van der Steen, J T;van Hout, H P J;Kylänen, M;Van den Block, L;Smets, T;Deliens, L;Gambassi, G;Froggatt, K;Szczerbińska, K;Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B D;, ;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 73
361 views DOI Abstract
2017
folklore studies on birth related customs within the banat community
;Alexin Otilia Daniela
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 40-49
315 views DOI Abstract
2017
Can digital stories go where palliative care research has never gone before? A descriptive qualitative study exploring the application of an emerging public health research method in an indigenous palliative care context
Williams, L.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
369 views DOI
2010
Collaboration between physicians and a hospital-based palliative care team in a general acute-care hospital in Japan
Mariko, Nishikitani;Masayo, Kashiwakgi;Mikako, Okuno;Nanako, Tamiya;Etsuko, Aruga;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 13-
491 views Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.