scandinavian journal of pain | Journament

Journal Ranking

#492 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

scandinavian journal of pain

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name scand j pain
Abbreviated Name scand j pain
ISSN 1877-8879
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/scandinavian-journal-of-pain
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (40 total)

2013
adiposity and hyperglycaemia in pregnancy and related health outcomes in european ethnic minorities of asian and african origin: a review
;Anne Karen Jenum;Line Sletner;Christine Sommer;Annhild Mosdøl;Anne Bærug;Kjersti Mørkrid
Vol. 57 , pp. 1-22
675 views DOI Abstract
2010
postprandial energy expenditure in whole-food and processed-food meals: implications for daily energy expenditure
;Sadie B. Barr;Jonathan C. Wright
Vol. 54 , pp. 1-9
398 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of different home-cooking methods on the bioaccessibility of zinc and iron in conventionally bred cowpea (vigna unguiculata l. walp) consumed in brazil
;Elenilda J. Pereira;Lucia M. J. Carvalho;Gisela M. Dellamora-Ortiz;Flávio S. N. Cardoso;José L. V. Carvalho
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-6
396 views DOI Abstract
2014
hormonal response to l-arginine supplementation in physically active individuals
;Davi Vieira Teixeira da Silva;Carlos Adam Conte-Junior;Vânia Margaret Flosi Paschoalin;Thiago da Silveira Alvares
Vol. 58 , pp. 1-6
379 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of a fermented dietary supplement containing chromium and zinc on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study
;Yu-Mi Lee;Petra Wolf;Hans Hauner;Thomas Skurk
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-6
377 views DOI Abstract
2016
enteral sesame oil therapeutically relieves disease severity in rat experimental osteoarthritis
;Dur-Zong Hsu;Pei-Yi Chu;I-Ming Jou
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-6
371 views DOI Abstract
2010
Does co-administration of paroxetine change oxycodone analgesia: An interaction study in chronic pain patients.
Lemberg, K K;Heiskanen, T E;Neuvonen, M;Kontinen, V K;Neuvonen, P J;Dahl, M-L;Kalso, E A;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 24-33
365 views DOI Abstract
2016
chronic leucine supplementation improves lipid metabolism in c57bl/6j mice fed with a high-fat/cholesterol diet
;Jun Jiao;Shu-Fen Han;Wei Zhang;Jia-Ying Xu;Xing Tong;Xue-Bin Yin;Lin-Xi Yuan;Li-Qiang Qin
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-10
361 views DOI Abstract
2015
dietary strawberry seed oil affects metabolite formation in the distal intestine and ameliorates lipid metabolism in rats fed an obesogenic diet
;Adam Jurgoński;Bartosz Fotschki;Jerzy Juśkiewicz
Vol. 59 , pp. 1-10
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Educational interventions to improve medical students' knowledge of acute pain management: A randomized study
Poulseno, M.
Vol. 19 , pp. 619-622
355 views DOI
View All 40 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.