Indexed in Journament

scandinavian journal of pain

ISSN 1877-8879· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,380 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 68% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name scand j pain
Abbreviated Name scand j pain
ISSN 1877-8879
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/scandinavian-journal-of-pain

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for scandinavian journal of pain
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 55.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 8.6 13.4
Content Distribution 78.5 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2013
adiposity and hyperglycaemia in pregnancy and related health outcomes in european ethnic minorities of asian and african origin: a review
Vol. 57 , pp. 1-22
742 views DOI Abstract
2010
2016
effect of different home-cooking methods on the bioaccessibility of zinc and iron in conventionally bred cowpea (vigna unguiculata l. walp) consumed in brazil
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-6
455 views DOI Abstract
2016
chronic leucine supplementation improves lipid metabolism in c57bl/6j mice fed with a high-fat/cholesterol diet
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-10
431 views DOI Abstract
2014
hormonal response to l-arginine supplementation in physically active individuals
Vol. 58 , pp. 1-6
429 views DOI Abstract
2010
Does co-administration of paroxetine change oxycodone analgesia: An interaction study in chronic pain patients.
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 24-33
419 views DOI Abstract
2016
enteral sesame oil therapeutically relieves disease severity in rat experimental osteoarthritis
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-6
406 views DOI Abstract
2015
2016
meals based on vegetable protein sources (beans and peas) are more satiating than meals based on animal protein sources (veal and pork) – a randomized cross-over meal test study
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-9
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
rhus verniciflua leaf extract suppresses obesity in high-fat diet-induced obese mice
Vol. 63 , pp. 1-9
280 views DOI Abstract
2018
alignments of endocrine, anthropometric, and metabolic parameters in type 2 diabetes after intervention with an okinawa-based nordic diet
Vol. 62 , pp. 1-12
280 views DOI Abstract
2018
sodium and potassium urinary excretion and their ratio in the elderly: results from the nutrition up 65 study
Vol. 62 , pp. 1-10
388 views DOI Abstract
2016
a pilot, short-term dietary manipulation of branched chain amino acids has modest influence on fasting levels of branched chain amino acids
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-9
232 views DOI Abstract
2016
dietary supplementation with a specific melon concentrate reverses vascular dysfunction induced by cafeteria diet
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-9
309 views DOI Abstract
2016
metabolic effects of quail eggs in diabetes-induced rats: comparison with chicken eggs
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-7
305 views DOI Abstract
2016
meals based on vegetable protein sources (beans and peas) are more satiating than meals based on animal protein sources (veal and pork) – a randomized cross-over meal test study
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-9
392 views DOI Abstract
2016
sub-patterns of food consumption and hyperglycemia in mexican young people: a study by factor analysis
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-7
329 views DOI Abstract
2016
a double-blind, randomized, and active-controlled phase iii study of herbiron drink in the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia in premenopausal females in taiwan
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-9
307 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,380 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

78.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.