Indexed in Journament

fiabilitate şi durabilitate

ISSN 1844-640X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,718 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
29 Articles
Scores higher than 39.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name fiabilitate şi durabilitate
Abbreviated Name fiabilitate şi durabilitate
ISSN 1844-640X
URL http://www.utgjiu.ro/rev_mec/?s=mecanica

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 70.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for fiabilitate şi durabilitate
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 70.5 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

2016
incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer in malaysia
Vol. 38 , pp. -
569 views DOI Abstract
2017
2016
the exposure rate to hepatitis b and c viruses among medical waste handlers in three government hospitals, southern ethiopia
Vol. 38 , pp. -
523 views DOI Abstract
2017
health disparities between lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults and the general population in south korea: rainbow connection project i
Vol. 39 , pp. -
488 views DOI Abstract
2015
demographic characteristics and intravenous drug use among hepatitis c patients in the kota setar district, kedah, malaysia
Vol. 37 , pp. -
464 views DOI Abstract
2016
ecological context of infant mortality in high-focus states of india
Vol. 38 , pp. -
420 views DOI Abstract
2012
TECHNOLOGIES FOR BIOREMEDIATION OF SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
Vol. 1 supliment , No. 10 , pp. 291-296
406 views Abstract
2019
SYSTEM MADE UP OF AN ELEVATOR ACTUATED BY A TRANSLATING CAM AND AN AUXILIARY ROBOT FOR BEING USED IN OVERGROUND OR UNDERGROUND PARKING
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 50-55
253 views Abstract
2018
ELEVATOR-TYPE PARKING LOTS
Vol. 1 , No. 21 , pp. 80-85
149 views Abstract
2017
estimation of the rate and number of underreported deliberate self-poisoning attempts in western iran in 2015
Vol. 39 , pp. -
227 views DOI Abstract
2017
the direction of restructuring of a korea field epidemiology training program through questionnaire survey among communicable disease response staff in korea
Vol. 39 , pp. -
335 views DOI Abstract
2017
health disparities between lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults and the general population in south korea: rainbow connection project i
Vol. 39 , pp. -
488 views DOI Abstract
2017
2017
the criteria for metabolic syndrome and the national health screening and education system in japan
Vol. 39 , pp. -
324 views DOI Abstract
2016
ecological context of infant mortality in high-focus states of india
Vol. 38 , pp. -
420 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,718 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.