fiabilitate şi durabilitate | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1185 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

fiabilitate şi durabilitate

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name fiabilitate şi durabilitate
Abbreviated Name fiabilitate şi durabilitate
ISSN 1844-640X
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.utgjiu.ro/rev_mec/?s=mecanica
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2016
incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer in malaysia
;Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan;Ibtisam Ismail;Mohd Azri Mohd Suan;Faizah Ahmad;Wan Khamizar Wan Khazim;Zabedah Othman;Rosaida Mat Said;Wei Leong Tan;Siti Rahmah @ Noor Syahireen Mohammed;Shahrul Aiman Soelar;Nik Raihan Nik Mustapha
Vol. 38 , pp. -
513 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of antiretroviral therapy on changes in the fertility intentions of human immunodeficiency virus-positive women in addis ababa, ethiopia: a prospective follow-up study
;Hussen Mekonnen;Fikre Enquselassie
Vol. 39 , pp. -
504 views DOI Abstract
2017
effects of living alone versus with others and of housemate type on smoking, drinking, dietary habits, and physical activity among elderly people
;Seungmin Jeong;Sung il Cho
Vol. 39 , pp. -
498 views DOI Abstract
2016
the exposure rate to hepatitis b and c viruses among medical waste handlers in three government hospitals, southern ethiopia
;Anteneh Amsalu;Mesfin Worku;Endale Tadesse;Techalew Shimelis
Vol. 38 , pp. -
478 views DOI Abstract
2017
factors affecting satisfaction with cancer information provided through the social networking services of the national cancer information center in korea
;Su Yeon Kye;Min Hee Lee;Jisu Yoo;Kyung Hee Oh;Jae Kwan Jun
Vol. 39 , pp. -
477 views DOI Abstract
2017
health disparities between lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults and the general population in south korea: rainbow connection project i
;Horim Yi;Hyemin Lee;Jooyoung Park;Bokyoung Choi;Seung-Sup Kim
Vol. 39 , pp. -
438 views DOI Abstract
2015
disadvantages of publishing biomedical research articles in english for non-native speakers of english
;Mohsen Rezaeian
Vol. 37 , pp. -
423 views DOI Abstract
2015
demographic characteristics and intravenous drug use among hepatitis c patients in the kota setar district, kedah, malaysia
;Wei Leong Tan;Goh Yihui;Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan
Vol. 37 , pp. -
417 views DOI Abstract
2016
ecological context of infant mortality in high-focus states of india
;Laishram Ladusingh;Ashish Kumar Gupta;Awdhesh Yadav
Vol. 38 , pp. -
381 views DOI Abstract
2012
TECHNOLOGIES FOR BIOREMEDIATION OF SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
POPA, Roxana Gabriela;
Vol. 1 supliment , No. 10 , pp. 291-296
349 views Abstract
View All 29 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.