Indexed in Journament

jurnal perspektif pembiayaan dan pembangunan daerah

ISSN 2355-8520· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,197 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
3 Articles
Scores higher than 51.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah (The Journal of Perspectives on Financing and Regional Development) is focused on publishing both theoretical and empirical papers in all areas economics, regional financing, and regional development. Using a wide range of research methods including statistical analysis, case studies, field research, articles examine significant research questions from a broad range of perspectives. Subject areas suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields: Regional Financing Regional Development Development Economics Financial Economics International Economics International Trade Labor Economics Macroeconomics Monetary Economics Public Finance The Functioning of Market
Short Name jppd
Abbreviated Name jppd
ISSN 2355-8520
URL https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JES
Author Instructions https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/JES/about/submissions#authorGuidelines

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 21.0
Community Impact 17.1
Content Distribution 88.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 21.0 25.7
Community Impact 17.1 5.8
Content Distribution 88.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (3)

2019
The influence of accounting internal control and human resources capacity on reliability and timeliness of regional government financial reporting (a study in Special Region of Yogyakarta Province)
Oktyawati, Dianila;Fajri, Faridiah Aghadiati;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 525-534
445 views Abstract
2019
The suitability of cryptocurrency in the structure of Islamic banking and finance
Lawal, Ibrahim Mohammed;
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 639-648
368 views Abstract
2019
Modeling the effects of health care expenditure and economic growth in Nigeria: An econometric analysis
Anochiwa, Lasbrey Iheanyi;Obila, Eze;Enyoghasim, Michael;
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 573-582
302 views Abstract
2019
The suitability of cryptocurrency in the structure of Islamic banking and finance
Lawal, Ibrahim Mohammed;
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 639-648
368 views Abstract
2019
Modeling the effects of health care expenditure and economic growth in Nigeria: An econometric analysis
Anochiwa, Lasbrey Iheanyi;Obila, Eze;Enyoghasim, Michael;
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 573-582
302 views Abstract
2019
The influence of accounting internal control and human resources capacity on reliability and timeliness of regional government financial reporting (a study in Special Region of Yogyakarta Province)
Oktyawati, Dianila;Fajri, Faridiah Aghadiati;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 525-534
445 views Abstract
Journament Score
32.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,197 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

21.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

17.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

88.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.