bmc psychology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2562 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

bmc psychology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name bmc psychol
Abbreviated Name bmc psychol
ISSN 2050-7283
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2020
Effects of a cognitive ergonomics workplace intervention (CogErg) on cognitive strain and well-being: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. A study protocol
Kalakoski, V.
Vol. 8 , pp. 0-0
624 views DOI
2019
Effects of adding psychosocial stimulation for children of lactating mothers using an unconditional cash transfer platform on neurocognitive behavior of children in rural Bangladesh: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Hossain, Sheikh Jamal;Roy, Bharati Rani;Salveen, Nur-E;Hasan, Mohammad Imrul;Tipu, S M Mulk Uddin;Shiraji, Shamima;Tofail, Fahmida;Hamadani, Jena D;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 13
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of martial arts participation on mental and psychosocial health outcomes: a randomised controlled trial of a secondary school-based mental health promotion program.
Moore, Brian;Dudley, Dean;Woodcock, Stuart;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 60
410 views DOI Abstract
2017
Expanding protection motivation theory: investigating an application to animal owners and emergency responders in bushfire emergencies.
Westcott, Rachel;Ronan, Kevin;Bambrick, Hilary;Taylor, Melanie;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 13
394 views DOI Abstract
2018
Mental health, violence and psychological coercion among female and male trafficking survivors in the greater Mekong sub-region: a cross-sectional study.
Iglesias-Rios, Lisbeth;Harlow, Siobán D;Burgard, Sarah A;Kiss, Ligia;Zimmerman, Cathy;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 56
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring the effect of the 'Growing Together' parenting education kit on early parenting - study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Shafiei, Touran;McLachlan, Helen L;Nicholson, Jan M;Hay, Sarah;Newton, Michelle;Grimes, Heather;McLardie-Hore, Fiona;Forster, Della A;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 39
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
A randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of two teaching methods on preschool children's language and communication, executive functions, socioemotional comprehension, and early math skills.
Gerholm, Tove;Kallioinen, Petter;Tonér, Signe;Frankenberg, Sofia;Kjällander, Susanne;Palmer, Anna;Lenz-Taguchi, Hillevi;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 59
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association among dispositional mindfulness, self-compassion, and leukocyte telomere length in Chinese adults.
Keng, Shian-Ling;Yim, Onn Siong;Lai, Poh San;Chew, Soo Hong;Ebstein, Richard P;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 47
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
Perceived organizational justice and turnover intention among hospital healthcare workers.
Mengstie, Missaye Mulatie;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 19
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yoga intervention and reminder e-mails for reducing cancer-related fatigue-a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Zetzl, T.
Vol. 7 , pp. 0-0
274 views DOI
View All 15 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
32
15
30
40
36
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.