Indexed in Journament

cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology

ISSN 1099-9809· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,096 of 29,299 scored journals (34,034 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 68.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name cultur divers ethnic minor psychol
Abbreviated Name cultur divers ethnic minor psychol
ISSN 1099-9809

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 27.2
Innovation 55.5
Community Impact 11.4
Content Distribution 82.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.6
Accessibility — 23.3
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 27.2 25.9
Innovation 55.5 24.1
Community Impact 11.4 6.6
Content Distribution 82.2 89.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2010
differential impact of ageing on cellular and humoral immunity to a persistent murine γ-herpesvirus
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 3-
654 views DOI Abstract
2010
multi factorial interactions in the pathogenesis pathway of alzheimer’s disease: a new risk charts for prevention of dementia
Vol. 7 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. S4-
575 views DOI Abstract
2019
Parenting in 2 worlds: Effects of a culturally grounded parenting intervention for urban American Indians on participant cultural engagement.
508 views DOI Abstract
2018
Risk and protective factors of intimate partner violence among South Asian immigrant women and perceived need for services.
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 442-452
445 views DOI Abstract
2009
Gender, family, and community correlates of mental health in South Asian Americans.
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 265-74
445 views DOI Abstract
2017
Feminist identity among women and men from four ethnic groups.
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 134-142
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
The relationships between emerging adult transition themes, adverse childhood experiences, and substance use patterns among a community cohort of Hispanics.
392 views DOI Abstract
2015
Person-environment fit: everyday conflict and coparenting conflict in Mexican-origin teen mother families.
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 136-45
392 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethnic discrimination and weight outcomes among Latinx emerging adults: Examinations of an individual-level mediator and cultural moderators.
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
Parenting in 2 worlds: Effects of a culturally grounded parenting intervention for urban American Indians on participant cultural engagement.
508 views DOI Abstract
2019
The relationships between emerging adult transition themes, adverse childhood experiences, and substance use patterns among a community cohort of Hispanics.
392 views DOI Abstract
2018
Risk and protective factors of intimate partner violence among South Asian immigrant women and perceived need for services.
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 442-452
445 views DOI Abstract
2017
Feminist identity among women and men from four ethnic groups.
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 134-142
419 views DOI Abstract
2017
Risk, resilience, and depressive symptoms in low-income African American fathers.
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 70-80
308 views DOI Abstract
2016
Affect and understanding during everyday cross-race experiences.
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 237-46
289 views DOI Abstract
2015
Person-environment fit: everyday conflict and coparenting conflict in Mexican-origin teen mother families.
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 136-45
392 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,096 of 29,299 scored
(34,034 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

27.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

55.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

82.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.