Indexed in Journament

journal of cross-cultural gerontology

ISSN 1573-0719· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,058 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
8 Articles
Scores higher than 52% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j cross cult gerontol
Abbreviated Name j cross cult gerontol
ISSN 1573-0719

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 38.9
Innovation 24.0
Community Impact 12.1
Content Distribution 88.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 38.9 25.8
Innovation 24.0 27.4
Community Impact 12.1 7.8
Content Distribution 88.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2017
dual stimuli-responsive fe3o4 graft poly(acrylic acid)-block-poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl ferrocenecarboxylate) copolymer micromicelles: surface raft synthesis, self-assembly and drug release applications
;Yuan Wang;Xue-Yin Zhang;Yan-Ling Luo;Feng Xu;Ya-Shao Chen;Yu-Yu Su
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
489 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ageing and the Case of Democratic Medicine in Japan.
Hames, Aaron;
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Coping Strategies Utilized by Middle-Aged and Older Latino Caregivers of Loved Ones with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia.
Balbim, Guilherme M;Marques, Isabela G;Cortez, Claudia;Magallanes, Melissa;Rocha, Judith;Marquez, David X;
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 355-371
380 views DOI Abstract
2012
biotemplating rod-like viruses for the synthesis of copper nanorods and nanowires
;Zhou Jing C;Soto Carissa M;Chen Mu-San;Bruckman Michael A;Moore Martin H;Barry Edward;Ratna Banahalli R;Pehrsson Pehr E;Spies Bradley R;Confer Tammie S
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 18-
369 views DOI Abstract
2017
Ethnic and Gender Differences in Preferred Activities among Māori and non-Māori of Advanced age in New Zealand.
Wright-St Clair, Valerie A;Rapson, Angela;Kepa, Mere;Connolly, Martin;Keeling, Sally;Rolleston, Anna;Teh, Ruth;Broad, Joanna B;Dyall, Lorna;Jatrana, Santosh;Wiles, Janine;Pillai, Avinesh;Garrett, Nick;Kerse, Ngaire;
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 433-446
357 views DOI Abstract
2014
Listening to the Voices of Native Hawaiian Elders and 'Ohana Caregivers: Discussions on Aging, Health, and Care Preferences
Browne, C.
Vol. 29 , pp. 131-151
326 views DOI
2011
quantitative analysis of nanoparticle internalization in mammalian cells by high resolution x-ray microscopy
;Hua Tzu-En;Lai Sheng-Feng;Chu Yong S;Wang Cheng-Liang;Petibois Cyril;Chien Chia-Chi;Chen Hsiang-Hsin;Chen Yi-Yun;Cai Xiaoqing;Kempson Ivan M;Hwu Yeukuang;Margaritondo Giorgio
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 14-
306 views DOI Abstract
2010
binary polypeptide system for permanent and oriented protein immobilization
;Bailes Julian;Niranjan Dhevahi;Zhang Fan;Darios Frédéric;Ferrari Enrico;Soloviev Mikhail;Davletov Bazbek
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 9-
278 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ageing and the Case of Democratic Medicine in Japan.
Hames, Aaron;
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Coping Strategies Utilized by Middle-Aged and Older Latino Caregivers of Loved Ones with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia.
Balbim, Guilherme M;Marques, Isabela G;Cortez, Claudia;Magallanes, Melissa;Rocha, Judith;Marquez, David X;
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 355-371
380 views DOI Abstract
2017
dual stimuli-responsive fe3o4 graft poly(acrylic acid)-block-poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl ferrocenecarboxylate) copolymer micromicelles: surface raft synthesis, self-assembly and drug release applications
;Yuan Wang;Xue-Yin Zhang;Yan-Ling Luo;Feng Xu;Ya-Shao Chen;Yu-Yu Su
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
489 views DOI Abstract
2017
Ethnic and Gender Differences in Preferred Activities among Māori and non-Māori of Advanced age in New Zealand.
Wright-St Clair, Valerie A;Rapson, Angela;Kepa, Mere;Connolly, Martin;Keeling, Sally;Rolleston, Anna;Teh, Ruth;Broad, Joanna B;Dyall, Lorna;Jatrana, Santosh;Wiles, Janine;Pillai, Avinesh;Garrett, Nick;Kerse, Ngaire;
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 433-446
357 views DOI Abstract
2014
Listening to the Voices of Native Hawaiian Elders and 'Ohana Caregivers: Discussions on Aging, Health, and Care Preferences
Browne, C.
Vol. 29 , pp. 131-151
326 views DOI
2012
biotemplating rod-like viruses for the synthesis of copper nanorods and nanowires
;Zhou Jing C;Soto Carissa M;Chen Mu-San;Bruckman Michael A;Moore Martin H;Barry Edward;Ratna Banahalli R;Pehrsson Pehr E;Spies Bradley R;Confer Tammie S
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 18-
369 views DOI Abstract
2011
quantitative analysis of nanoparticle internalization in mammalian cells by high resolution x-ray microscopy
;Hua Tzu-En;Lai Sheng-Feng;Chu Yong S;Wang Cheng-Liang;Petibois Cyril;Chien Chia-Chi;Chen Hsiang-Hsin;Chen Yi-Yun;Cai Xiaoqing;Kempson Ivan M;Hwu Yeukuang;Margaritondo Giorgio
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 14-
306 views DOI Abstract
2010
binary polypeptide system for permanent and oriented protein immobilization
;Bailes Julian;Niranjan Dhevahi;Zhang Fan;Darios Frédéric;Ferrari Enrico;Soloviev Mikhail;Davletov Bazbek
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 9-
278 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,058 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

24.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

88.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.