critical perspectives on accounting | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3236 / 33,987
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

critical perspectives on accounting

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name critical perspectives on accounting
Abbreviated Name critical perspectives on accounting
ISSN 1045-2354
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (7 total)

2017
male non-insulin users with type 2 diabetes mellitus are predisposed to gastric corpus-predominant inflammation after h. pylori infection
;Yao-Jong Yang;Chung-Tai Wu;Horng-Yih Ou;Chin-Han Lin;Hsiu-Chi Cheng;Wei-Lun Chang;Wei-Ying Chen;Hsiao-Bai Yang;Cheng-Chan Lu;Bor-Shyang Sheu
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
292 views DOI Abstract
2017
cancer immunotherapies targeting the pd-1 signaling pathway
;Yoshiko Iwai;Junzo Hamanishi;Kenji Chamoto;Tasuku Honjo
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
260 views DOI Abstract
2008
Whose voice is it anyway? Rethinking the oral history method in accounting research on race, ethnicity and gender
Kim, S.
Vol. 19 , pp. 1346-1369
256 views DOI
2019
Behind the World Bank's ringing declarations of “social accountability”: Ghana's public financial management reform
Alawattage, C.
, pp. 0-0
239 views DOI
2019
Money laundering through the strategic management of accounting transactions
Ravenda, D.
Vol. 60 , pp. 65-85
233 views DOI
2010
Accounting infrastructure and accountability in the management of public expenditure in developing countries: A focus on Nigeria
Iyoha, F.
Vol. 21 , pp. 361-373
229 views DOI
2018
After Habermas: Applying Axel Honneth's critical theory in accounting research
Tweedie, D.
Vol. 57 , pp. 39-55
201 views DOI
42
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.