journal of palliative medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6670 / 33,972
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of palliative medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j palliat med
Abbreviated Name j palliat med
ISSN 1096-6218
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2019
A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial of Perioperative Palliative Care Surrounding Cancer Surgery for Patients and Their Family Members (PERIOP-PC).
Aslakson, Rebecca A;Chandrashekaran, Shivani V;Rickerson, Elizabeth;Fahy, Bridget N;Johnston, Fabian M;Miller, Judith A;Conca-Cheng, Alison;Wang, Suwei;Morris, Arden M;Lorenz, Karl;Temel, Jennifer S;Smith, Thomas J;
Vol. 22 , No. S1 , pp. 44-57
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mobile Health Technologies for Continuous Monitoring of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care Aiming to Predict Health Status Deterioration: A Feasibility Study.
Pavic, Matea;Klaas, Vanessa;Theile, Gudrun;Kraft, Johannes;Tröster, Gerhard;Blum, David;Guckenberger, Matthias;
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Surprise Question and Performance Status Indicate Urgency of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.
Verhoef, Mary-Joanne;de Nijs, Ellen J M;Fiocco, Marta;Heringhaus, Christian;Horeweg, Nanda;van der Linden, Yvette M;
369 views DOI Abstract
2018
My Kite Will Fly: Improving Communication and Understanding in Young Children When a Mother Is Diagnosed with Life-Threatening Gynecological Cancer.
Holland, Cynthia;Hocking, Alison;Joubert, Lynette;McDermott, Fiona;Niski, Marcus D;Thomson Salo, Frances;Quinn, Michael A;
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 78-84
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research Focused on Community-Based Delivery of Palliative Care: Overview of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Funding Initiative.
Khan, Carly P;Parver, Stephanie;Kennedy Lesch, Julie;DiGioia, Kimberly;Gaglio, Bridget;Daugherty, Sarah;Clauser, Steven B;Arora, Neeraj K;
Vol. 22 , No. S1 , pp. 2-6
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
"I'd Want to Know, Because a Year's Not a Long Time to Prepare for a Death": Role of Prognostic Information in Shared Decision Making among Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Niranjan, Soumya J;Turkman, Yasemin;Williams, Beverly R;Williams, Courtney P;Halilova, Karina I;Smith, Tom;Knight, Sara J;Bhatia, Smita;Rocque, Gabrielle B;
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
So Help Me, God: Religiosity and End-of-Life Choices in a Nationally Representative Sample.
Hoe, Deborah F;Enguidanos, Susan;
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
Protocol for a Noninferiority Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care (HomePal).
Nguyen, Huong Q;Mularski, Richard A;Edwards, Paula E;Lynn, Joanne;Machado, Mary T;McBurnie, Mary Ann;McMullen, Carmit;Mittman, Brian S;Reinke, Lynn R;Shen, Ernest;Wang, Susan E;Werch, Henry S;, ;
Vol. 22 , No. S1 , pp. 20-33
285 views DOI Abstract
2019
Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Telepalliative Care
Calton BA;Rabow MW;Branagan L;Dionne-Odom JN;Parker Oliver D;Bakitas MA;Fratkin MD;Lustbader D;Jones CA;Ritchie CS;;
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. -
255 views Abstract
2004
Relieving pain and suffering in Colombia: one regulator's journey.
Chirolla, Maria Cristina;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 115-7
250 views
View All 12 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.