psycho-oncology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4669 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

psycho-oncology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name psychooncology
Abbreviated Name psychooncology
ISSN 1099-1611
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2019
No effect of CBT-based online self-help training to reduce fear of cancer recurrence: First results of the CAREST multicenter randomized controlled trial.
van Helmondt, Sanne Jasperine;van der Lee, Marije Liesbeth;van Woezik, Rosalie Antonia Maria;Lodder, Paul;de Vries, Jolanda;
467 views DOI Abstract
2018
A systematic review of quantitative observational studies investigating psychological distress in testicular cancer survivors.
Smith, Allan Ben;Rutherford, Claudia;Butow, Phyllis;Olver, Ian;Luckett, Tim;Grimison, Peter;Toner, Guy;Stockler, Martin;King, Madeleine;
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 1129-1137
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fear of cancer recurrence across the survivorship trajectory: Results from a survey of adult long-term cancer survivors.
Götze, Heide;Taubenheim, Sabine;Dietz, Andreas;Lordick, Florian;Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja;
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality of life and psychological distress in cancer survivors: The role of psycho-social resources for resilience.
Harms, Craig A;Cohen, Lynne;Pooley, Julie Ann;Chambers, Suzanne K;Galvão, Daniel A;Newton, Robert U;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 271-277
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of psychosocial oncology care in China: Consultation-liaison psychiatric service in a cancer center.
Li, Zimeng;Li, Jinjiang;Tang, Lili;Pang, Ying;
421 views DOI
2019
Greater Mindfulness Associated With Lower Pain, Fatigue, and Psychological Distress in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Zimmaro, Lauren A;Carson, James W;Olsen, Maren K;Sanders, Linda L;Keefe, Francis J;Porter, Laura S;
419 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring perceptions and practices of cancer care among caregivers and care recipients of breast cancer in India.
Parsekar, Shradha S;Bailey, Ajay;Binu, V S;Nair, Suma;
385 views DOI Abstract
2018
Predictors of long-term distress in female partners of men diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Hyde, Melissa K;Legg, Melissa;Occhipinti, Stefano;Lepore, Stephen J;Ugalde, Anna;Zajdlewicz, Leah;Laurie, Kirstyn;Dunn, Jeff;Chambers, Suzanne K;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 946-954
375 views DOI Abstract
2018
Re-validation and screening capacity of the 6-item version of the Cancer Worry Scale.
Custers, José A E;Kwakkenbos, Linda;van de Wal, Marieke;Prins, Judith B;Thewes, Belinda;
Vol. 27 , No. 11 , pp. 2609-2615
363 views DOI Abstract
2017
2015 President's Plenary International Psycho-oncology Society: psychosocial care as a human rights issue-challenges and opportunities.
Travado, Luzia;Breitbart, William;Grassi, Luigi;Fujisawa, Daisuke;Patenaude, Andrea;Baider, Lea;Connor, Stephen;Fingeret, Michelle;
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 563-569
340 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.