Indexed in Journament

clinical neurology and neurosurgery

ISSN 1872-6968· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,322 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 75% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name clin neurol neurosurg
Abbreviated Name clinical neurology and neurosurgery
ISSN 1872-6968

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 38.9
Innovation 49.5
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 81.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for clinical neurology and neurosurgery
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 38.9 25.8
Innovation 49.5 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 81.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2020
Herpes viruses in optic neuritis: Similar to Bell's palsy.
Vol. 188 , pp. 105588
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
An investigation of factors associated with the development of postoperative bone flap infection following decompressive craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty.
Vol. 186 , pp. 105509
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of constant-current pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary dystonia on cognition, mood and quality of life: Results from a prospective pilot trial.
Vol. 185 , pp. 105460
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
The treatment efficacy of galcanezumab for migraine: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Vol. 186 , pp. 105428
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effects of cigarette and maras powder (smokeless tobacco) on lumbar disc degeneration.
Vol. 186 , pp. 105500
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
Efficacy of sertraline in post-traumatic brain injury (post-TBI) depression and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Vol. 181 , pp. 104-111
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Malignant PRES and RCVS after brain surgery in the early postpartum period.
Vol. 185 , pp. 105489
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
Obesity and stroke in the COVID19 era
Vol. 196 , pp. 0-0
100 views DOI
2020
A novel missense mutation in CAV3 gene in an Italian family with persistent hyperCKemia, myalgia and hypercholesterolemia: Double-trouble.
Vol. 191 , pp. 105687
301 views DOI Abstract
2020
Herpes viruses in optic neuritis: Similar to Bell's palsy.
Vol. 188 , pp. 105588
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
The treatment efficacy of galcanezumab for migraine: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Vol. 186 , pp. 105428
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effects of cigarette and maras powder (smokeless tobacco) on lumbar disc degeneration.
Vol. 186 , pp. 105500
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
An investigation of factors associated with the development of postoperative bone flap infection following decompressive craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty.
Vol. 186 , pp. 105509
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of constant-current pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary dystonia on cognition, mood and quality of life: Results from a prospective pilot trial.
Vol. 185 , pp. 105460
386 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,322 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

49.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.