Indexed in Journament

European journal of orthodontics

ISSN 1460-2210· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.6/100
Journament Score
#12,358
Journament Rank
6
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Eur J Orthod
Abbreviated Name eur j orthod
ISSN 1460-2210

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (6)

2019
Outcome reporting discrepancies between trial entries and published final reports of orthodontic randomized controlled trials.
Koufatzidou, Marianna;Koletsi, Despina;Fleming, Padhraig S;Polychronopoulou, Argy;Pandis, Nikolaos;
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 225-230
316 views DOI Abstract
2014
evaluating tfp growth of the korean economy in 2000s through the comparison of growth accounting methods
;Shin, Suk ha
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 137-174
288 views DOI Abstract
1989
The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority
Peter Brook, William C. Shaw
181 views DOI Abstract
1983
Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years
Andersen Rk, V. Skieller
77 views DOI Abstract
2020
A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) method between direct bonding and indirect bonding techniques in adolescents: a single-centre, single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Atilla, Aykan Onur; Ozturk, Taner; Eruz, Mustafa Murat; Yagci, Ahmet
Vol. 42 , pp. 441-453
73 views DOI Abstract
2012
Contemporary Orthodontics (2012)
F. McDonald
37 views DOI Abstract
2020
A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) method between direct bonding and indirect bonding techniques in adolescents: a single-centre, single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Atilla, Aykan Onur; Ozturk, Taner; Eruz, Mustafa Murat; Yagci, Ahmet
Vol. 42 , pp. 441-453
73 views DOI Abstract
2019
Outcome reporting discrepancies between trial entries and published final reports of orthodontic randomized controlled trials.
Koufatzidou, Marianna;Koletsi, Despina;Fleming, Padhraig S;Polychronopoulou, Argy;Pandis, Nikolaos;
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 225-230
316 views DOI Abstract
2014
evaluating tfp growth of the korean economy in 2000s through the comparison of growth accounting methods
;Shin, Suk ha
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 137-174
288 views DOI Abstract
2012
Contemporary Orthodontics (2012)
F. McDonald
37 views DOI Abstract
1989
The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority
Peter Brook, William C. Shaw
181 views DOI Abstract
1983
Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years
Andersen Rk, V. Skieller
77 views DOI Abstract
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.