Indexed in Journament

Microbial biotechnology

ISSN 1751-7915· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
46.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #207 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 99.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Microbial Biotechnology publishes impactful research that advances the understanding and application of microorganisms, viruses, and microbial communities to solve global challenges. The journal promotes cutting-edge research in areas such as biofuels, bioremediation, industrial biotechnology, synthetic biology, and microbial ecology, with a focus on translating fundamental discoveries into practical applications.
Short Name Microb Biotechnol
Abbreviated Name microb biotechnol
ISSN 1751-7915
URL https://sfamjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17517915
Author Instructions https://sfamjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/17517915/author-guidelines

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Microbial biotechnology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.2
Accessibility 30.0 17.8
Timeliness 60.0 15.9
Diversity 57.4 28.2
Innovation 64.5 30.1
Community Impact 8.6 11.5
Content Distribution 70.2 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2019
Antimicrobial effects of microwave-induced plasma torch (MiniMIP) treatment on Candida albicans biofilms.
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pretreatment of Miscanthus with biomass-degrading bacteria for increasing delignification and enzymatic hydrolysability.
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 787-798
415 views DOI Abstract
2020
Harnessing microbial volatiles to replace pesticides and fertilizers.
379 views DOI Abstract
2020
An expanded CRISPRi toolbox for tunable control of gene expression in Pseudomonas putida.
360 views DOI Abstract
2012
los apellidos de los gitanos españoles en los censos de 1783-85 (the family names of gitanos or spanish romani in the listings of 1783-85)
, No. 19 , pp. 37-85
343 views DOI Abstract
2017
el teatro social como herramienta docente para el desarrollo de competencias interculturales = the social theater as a teaching tool for the development of intercultural competences
, No. 31 , pp. 175-194
300 views DOI Abstract
2025
A New Method for Constructing High-Resolution Phylogenomic Topologies Using Core Gene-Associated MNP Markers: A Case Study From Agaricus bisporus.
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. e70070
85 views DOI Abstract
2020
Harnessing microbial volatiles to replace pesticides and fertilizers.
379 views DOI Abstract
2020
An expanded CRISPRi toolbox for tunable control of gene expression in Pseudomonas putida.
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Art-omics: multi-omics meet archaeology and art conservation.
249 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pretreatment of Miscanthus with biomass-degrading bacteria for increasing delignification and enzymatic hydrolysability.
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 787-798
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antimicrobial effects of microwave-induced plasma torch (MiniMIP) treatment on Candida albicans biofilms.
456 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
46.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #207 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

46.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

57.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

64.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.