Indexed in Journament

international journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics

ISSN 1879-355X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
51.0 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #45 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 99.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name int j radiat oncol biol phys
Abbreviated Name int j radiat oncol biol phys
ISSN 1879-355X

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 60.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 80.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 60.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.2
Content Distribution 80.8 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2015
Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective
Kang J;Schwartz R;Flickinger J;Beriwal S;;
Vol. 93 , No. 5 , pp. -
536 views Abstract
1992
Correlation of the radiosensitization potency afforded by nitroacridine intercalators with their electron scavenging efficiency in DNA.
Anderson, R F;Denny, W A;Roberts, P B;Wardman, P;White, J;Wilson, W R;
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 537-40
502 views Abstract
2020
Aligning Requirements of Training and Assessment in Radiation Treatment Planning in the Era of Competency-Based Medical Education.
Moideen, Nikitha;de Metz, Catherine;Kalyvas, Maria;Soleas, Eleftherios;Egan, Rylan;Dalgarno, Nancy;
Vol. 106 , No. 1 , pp. 32-36
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Matched Case-Control Analysis of Clinical Outcomes for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with Pelvic Radiation Therapy.
Mudgway, Ross;Bryant, Alex K;Heide, Elena S;Riviere, Paul;O'Hare, Connor;Rose, Brent S;Murphy, James D;Simpson, Daniel R;
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Precision Adjuvant Therapy Based on Detailed Pathological Risk Factors for Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long Term Outcome Comparison of CGMH and NCCN Guidelines.
Lin, Chien-Yu;Fan, Kang-Hsing;Lee, Li-Yu;Hsueh, Chuen;Yang, Lan Yan;Ng, Shu-Hang;Wang, Hung-Ming;Hsieh, Chia-Hsun;Lin, Chih-Hung;Tsao, Chung-Kan;Kang, Chung-Jan;Fang, Tuan-Jen;Lee, Li-Ang;Huang, Shiang-Fu;Chang, Kai-Ping;Yen, Tzu-Chen;Tay, Ze Yun;Wen, Yu-Wen;Lee, Shu Ru;Liao, Chun-Ta;
403 views DOI Abstract
2016
Changes in Imaging and Cognition in Juvenile Rats After Whole-Brain Irradiation.
Brown, Robert J;Jun, Brandon J;Cushman, Jesse D;Nguyen, Christine;Beighley, Adam H;Blanchard, Johnny;Iwamoto, Kei;Schaue, Dorthe;Harris, Neil G;Jentsch, James D;Bluml, Stefan;McBride, William H;
Vol. 96 , No. 2 , pp. 470-478
403 views DOI Abstract
2017
Inclusion of Incidental Radiation Dose to the Cardiac Atria and Ventricles Does Not Improve the Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis in Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
Wijsman, Robin;Dankers, Frank J W M;Troost, Esther G C;Hoffmann, Aswin L;van der Heijden, Erik H F M;de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee;Bussink, Johan;
Vol. 99 , No. 2 , pp. 434-441
379 views DOI Abstract
2001
Phase II study assessing the effectiveness of Biafine cream as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced acute skin toxicity to the breast in women undergoing radiotherapy with concomitant CMF chemotherapy.
Szumacher, E;Wighton, A;Franssen, E;Chow, E;Tsao, M;Ackerman, I;Andersson, L;Kim, J;Wojcicka, A;Ung, Y;Sixel, K;Hayter, C;
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 81-6
369 views Abstract
2004
Comparison of the efficacy and acute toxicity of weekly versus daily chemoradiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Rakovitch, Eileen;Tsao, May;Ung, Yee;Pignol, Jean-Philippe;Cheung, Patrick;Chow, Edward;
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 196-203
359 views Abstract
2016
A Voxel-Based Approach to Explore Local Dose Differences Associated With Radiation-Induced Lung Damage.
Palma, Giuseppe;Monti, Serena;D'Avino, Vittoria;Conson, Manuel;Liuzzi, Raffaele;Pressello, Maria Cristina;Donato, Vittorio;Deasy, Joseph O;Quarantelli, Mario;Pacelli, Roberto;Cella, Laura;
Vol. 96 , No. 1 , pp. 127-33
353 views DOI Abstract
2025
Unveiling Cellular Responses and Underlying Immune Effects Induced by Boron Neutron Capture Therapy.
Mao, Hongyuan; Li, Jinyue; Huang, Chenhan; Li, Zerun; Ma, Xinyue; Jiang, Dizhi; Zhang, Xinyu; Wang, Tianzi; Cheng, Bo; Wang, Ruiqing; Wang, Jianbo; Cheng, Yufeng
99 views DOI Abstract
2020
Aligning Requirements of Training and Assessment in Radiation Treatment Planning in the Era of Competency-Based Medical Education.
Moideen, Nikitha;de Metz, Catherine;Kalyvas, Maria;Soleas, Eleftherios;Egan, Rylan;Dalgarno, Nancy;
Vol. 106 , No. 1 , pp. 32-36
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
Precision Adjuvant Therapy Based on Detailed Pathological Risk Factors for Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long Term Outcome Comparison of CGMH and NCCN Guidelines.
Lin, Chien-Yu;Fan, Kang-Hsing;Lee, Li-Yu;Hsueh, Chuen;Yang, Lan Yan;Ng, Shu-Hang;Wang, Hung-Ming;Hsieh, Chia-Hsun;Lin, Chih-Hung;Tsao, Chung-Kan;Kang, Chung-Jan;Fang, Tuan-Jen;Lee, Li-Ang;Huang, Shiang-Fu;Chang, Kai-Ping;Yen, Tzu-Chen;Tay, Ze Yun;Wen, Yu-Wen;Lee, Shu Ru;Liao, Chun-Ta;
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Matched Case-Control Analysis of Clinical Outcomes for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with Pelvic Radiation Therapy.
Mudgway, Ross;Bryant, Alex K;Heide, Elena S;Riviere, Paul;O'Hare, Connor;Rose, Brent S;Murphy, James D;Simpson, Daniel R;
422 views DOI Abstract
2017
Inclusion of Incidental Radiation Dose to the Cardiac Atria and Ventricles Does Not Improve the Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis in Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
Wijsman, Robin;Dankers, Frank J W M;Troost, Esther G C;Hoffmann, Aswin L;van der Heijden, Erik H F M;de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee;Bussink, Johan;
Vol. 99 , No. 2 , pp. 434-441
379 views DOI Abstract
2016
Changes in Imaging and Cognition in Juvenile Rats After Whole-Brain Irradiation.
Brown, Robert J;Jun, Brandon J;Cushman, Jesse D;Nguyen, Christine;Beighley, Adam H;Blanchard, Johnny;Iwamoto, Kei;Schaue, Dorthe;Harris, Neil G;Jentsch, James D;Bluml, Stefan;McBride, William H;
Vol. 96 , No. 2 , pp. 470-478
403 views DOI Abstract
2016
A Voxel-Based Approach to Explore Local Dose Differences Associated With Radiation-Induced Lung Damage.
Palma, Giuseppe;Monti, Serena;D'Avino, Vittoria;Conson, Manuel;Liuzzi, Raffaele;Pressello, Maria Cristina;Donato, Vittorio;Deasy, Joseph O;Quarantelli, Mario;Pacelli, Roberto;Cella, Laura;
Vol. 96 , No. 1 , pp. 127-33
353 views DOI Abstract
2015
Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective
Kang J;Schwartz R;Flickinger J;Beriwal S;;
Vol. 93 , No. 5 , pp. -
536 views Abstract
2011
Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an irradiation dose escalation study
Ren ZG;Zhao JD;Gu K;Chen Z;Lin JH;Xu ZY;Hu WG;Zhou ZH;Liu LM;Jiang GL;;
Vol. 79 , No. 2 , pp. -
337 views Abstract
2010
Melanin-covered nanoparticles for protection of bone marrow during radiation therapy of cancer
Schweitzer AD;Revskaya E;Chu P;Pazo V;Friedman M;Nosanchuk JD;Cahill S;Frases S;Casadevall A;Dadachova E;;
Vol. 78 , No. 5 , pp. -
323 views Abstract
Journament Score
51.0/100 · Average
Ranked #45 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

51.0/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

80.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.