international journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5824 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

international journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name int j radiat oncol biol phys
Abbreviated Name int j radiat oncol biol phys
ISSN 1879-355X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2015
Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective
Kang J;Schwartz R;Flickinger J;Beriwal S;;
Vol. 93 , No. 5 , pp. -
479 views Abstract
1992
Correlation of the radiosensitization potency afforded by nitroacridine intercalators with their electron scavenging efficiency in DNA.
Anderson, R F;Denny, W A;Roberts, P B;Wardman, P;White, J;Wilson, W R;
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 537-40
445 views Abstract
2020
Aligning Requirements of Training and Assessment in Radiation Treatment Planning in the Era of Competency-Based Medical Education.
Moideen, Nikitha;de Metz, Catherine;Kalyvas, Maria;Soleas, Eleftherios;Egan, Rylan;Dalgarno, Nancy;
Vol. 106 , No. 1 , pp. 32-36
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Matched Case-Control Analysis of Clinical Outcomes for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with Pelvic Radiation Therapy.
Mudgway, Ross;Bryant, Alex K;Heide, Elena S;Riviere, Paul;O'Hare, Connor;Rose, Brent S;Murphy, James D;Simpson, Daniel R;
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Precision Adjuvant Therapy Based on Detailed Pathological Risk Factors for Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long Term Outcome Comparison of CGMH and NCCN Guidelines.
Lin, Chien-Yu;Fan, Kang-Hsing;Lee, Li-Yu;Hsueh, Chuen;Yang, Lan Yan;Ng, Shu-Hang;Wang, Hung-Ming;Hsieh, Chia-Hsun;Lin, Chih-Hung;Tsao, Chung-Kan;Kang, Chung-Jan;Fang, Tuan-Jen;Lee, Li-Ang;Huang, Shiang-Fu;Chang, Kai-Ping;Yen, Tzu-Chen;Tay, Ze Yun;Wen, Yu-Wen;Lee, Shu Ru;Liao, Chun-Ta;
376 views DOI Abstract
2016
Changes in Imaging and Cognition in Juvenile Rats After Whole-Brain Irradiation.
Brown, Robert J;Jun, Brandon J;Cushman, Jesse D;Nguyen, Christine;Beighley, Adam H;Blanchard, Johnny;Iwamoto, Kei;Schaue, Dorthe;Harris, Neil G;Jentsch, James D;Bluml, Stefan;McBride, William H;
Vol. 96 , No. 2 , pp. 470-478
349 views DOI Abstract
2001
Phase II study assessing the effectiveness of Biafine cream as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced acute skin toxicity to the breast in women undergoing radiotherapy with concomitant CMF chemotherapy.
Szumacher, E;Wighton, A;Franssen, E;Chow, E;Tsao, M;Ackerman, I;Andersson, L;Kim, J;Wojcicka, A;Ung, Y;Sixel, K;Hayter, C;
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 81-6
341 views Abstract
2017
Inclusion of Incidental Radiation Dose to the Cardiac Atria and Ventricles Does Not Improve the Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis in Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
Wijsman, Robin;Dankers, Frank J W M;Troost, Esther G C;Hoffmann, Aswin L;van der Heijden, Erik H F M;de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee;Bussink, Johan;
Vol. 99 , No. 2 , pp. 434-441
337 views DOI Abstract
2004
Comparison of the efficacy and acute toxicity of weekly versus daily chemoradiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Rakovitch, Eileen;Tsao, May;Ung, Yee;Pignol, Jean-Philippe;Cheung, Patrick;Chow, Edward;
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 196-203
330 views Abstract
2016
A Voxel-Based Approach to Explore Local Dose Differences Associated With Radiation-Induced Lung Damage.
Palma, Giuseppe;Monti, Serena;D'Avino, Vittoria;Conson, Manuel;Liuzzi, Raffaele;Pressello, Maria Cristina;Donato, Vittorio;Deasy, Joseph O;Quarantelli, Mario;Pacelli, Roberto;Cella, Laura;
Vol. 96 , No. 1 , pp. 127-33
296 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.