Indexed in Journament

Translational vision science & technology

ISSN 2164-2591· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,382 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 40.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Transl Vis Sci Technol
Abbreviated Name transl vis sci technol
ISSN 2164-2591

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 38.9
Innovation 16.5
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 74.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 38.9 26.3
Innovation 16.5 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.3
Content Distribution 74.4 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2020
QuPath Automated Analysis of Optic Nerve Degeneration in Brown Norway Rats.
Mysona, Barbara A;Segar, Sharmila;Hernandez, Cecilia;Kim, Christian;Zhao, Jing;Mysona, David;Bollinger, Kathryn E;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 22
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-Term Follow-Up of Retinal Degenerations Associated With Mutations and Their Comparability to Phenotypes Associated With Mutations.
Talib, Mays;van Schooneveld, Mary J;van Duuren, Roos J G;Van Cauwenbergh, Caroline;Ten Brink, Jacoline B;De Baere, Elfride;Florijn, Ralph J;Schalij-Delfos, Nicoline E;Leroy, Bart P;Bergen, Arthur A;Boon, Camiel J F;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 24
427 views DOI Abstract
2021
Evaluation of Physiological Parameters on Discomfort Glare Thresholds Using LUMIZ 100 Tool.
Marié, Sarah;Montés-Micó, Robert;Martínez-Albert, Noelia;García-Marqués, José V;Cerviño, Alejandro;
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. 28
337 views DOI Abstract
2018
Depth-Based, Motion-Stabilized Colorization of Microscope-Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography Volumes for Microscope-Independent Microsurgery
Isaac D. Bleicher;Moseph Jackson-Atogi;Christian Viehland;Hesham Gabr;Joseph A. Izatt;Cynthia A. Toth;
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. 1-1
304 views
2018
Volumetric Measurement of Subretinal Blebs Using Microscope-Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography
S. Tammy Hsu;Hesham Gabr;Christian Viehland;Karim Sleiman;Hoan T. Ngo;Oscar M. Carrasco-Zevallos;Lejla Vajzovic;Ryan P. McNabb;Sandra S. Stinnett;Joseph A. Izatt;Anthony N. Kuo;Cynthia A. Toth;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 19-19
296 views
2016
Volume Averaging of Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Impacts Retinal Segmentation in Children
Carmelina Trimboli-Heidler;Kelly Vogt;Robert A. Avery;
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 12-12
276 views
2014
Experimental Application of Piezoelectric Actuator-Driven Pulsed Water Jets in Retinal Vascular Surgery
Hiroshi Kunikata;Yuji Tanaka;Naoko Aizawa;Atsuhiro Nakagawa;Teiji Tominaga;Toru Nakazawa;
Vol. 3 , No. 6 , pp. 10-10
267 views
2018
Predicting Refractive Outcome of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Using Corneal Properties
Mengyu Wang;Yaohua Zhang;Wenjing Wu;Joshua A. Young;Kathryn M. Hatch;Roberto Pineda II;Tobias Elze;Yan Wang;
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 11-11
257 views
2020
Biofeedback Rehabilitation and Visual Cortex Response in Stargardt's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Paolo Melillo;Anna Prinster;Valentina Di Iorio;Gaia Olivo;Francesco Maria D'Alterio;Sirio Cocozza;Mario Quarantelli;Francesco Testa;Arturo Brunetti;Francesca Simonelli;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 6-6
241 views
2017
CRISPR-Cas Genome Surgery in Ophthalmology
James E. DiCarlo;Jesse D. Sengillo;Sally Justus;Thiago Cabral;Stephen H. Tsang;Vinit B. Mahajan;
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 13-13
236 views
2021
Retina Vascular Perfusion Dynamics During Exercise With and Without Face Masks in Healthy Young Adults: An OCT Angiography Study
Dihao Hua;Yishuang Xu;Peter Heiduschka;Wenliang Zhang;Xiao Zhang;Xiangbing Zeng;Xiangxiang Zhu;Tao He;Hongmei Zheng;Xuan Xiao;Yiqiao Xing;Zhen Chen;Changzheng Chen;
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 23-23
188 views
2021
Evaluation of Physiological Parameters on Discomfort Glare Thresholds Using LUMIZ 100 Tool.
Marié, Sarah;Montés-Micó, Robert;Martínez-Albert, Noelia;García-Marqués, José V;Cerviño, Alejandro;
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. 28
337 views DOI Abstract
2020
Biofeedback Rehabilitation and Visual Cortex Response in Stargardt's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Paolo Melillo;Anna Prinster;Valentina Di Iorio;Gaia Olivo;Francesco Maria D'Alterio;Sirio Cocozza;Mario Quarantelli;Francesco Testa;Arturo Brunetti;Francesca Simonelli;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 6-6
241 views
2020
QuPath Automated Analysis of Optic Nerve Degeneration in Brown Norway Rats.
Mysona, Barbara A;Segar, Sharmila;Hernandez, Cecilia;Kim, Christian;Zhao, Jing;Mysona, David;Bollinger, Kathryn E;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 22
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-Term Follow-Up of Retinal Degenerations Associated With Mutations and Their Comparability to Phenotypes Associated With Mutations.
Talib, Mays;van Schooneveld, Mary J;van Duuren, Roos J G;Van Cauwenbergh, Caroline;Ten Brink, Jacoline B;De Baere, Elfride;Florijn, Ralph J;Schalij-Delfos, Nicoline E;Leroy, Bart P;Bergen, Arthur A;Boon, Camiel J F;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 24
427 views DOI Abstract
2018
Depth-Based, Motion-Stabilized Colorization of Microscope-Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography Volumes for Microscope-Independent Microsurgery
Isaac D. Bleicher;Moseph Jackson-Atogi;Christian Viehland;Hesham Gabr;Joseph A. Izatt;Cynthia A. Toth;
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. 1-1
304 views
2018
Volumetric Measurement of Subretinal Blebs Using Microscope-Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography
S. Tammy Hsu;Hesham Gabr;Christian Viehland;Karim Sleiman;Hoan T. Ngo;Oscar M. Carrasco-Zevallos;Lejla Vajzovic;Ryan P. McNabb;Sandra S. Stinnett;Joseph A. Izatt;Anthony N. Kuo;Cynthia A. Toth;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 19-19
296 views
2018
Predicting Refractive Outcome of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Using Corneal Properties
Mengyu Wang;Yaohua Zhang;Wenjing Wu;Joshua A. Young;Kathryn M. Hatch;Roberto Pineda II;Tobias Elze;Yan Wang;
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 11-11
257 views
2017
Evaluating Changes in Ocular Redness Using a Novel Automated Method
Francisco Amparo;Jia Yin;Antonio Di Zazzo;Tulio Abud;Ula V. Jurkunas;Pedram Hamrah;Reza Dana;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 13-13
105 views
2017
CRISPR-Cas Genome Surgery in Ophthalmology
James E. DiCarlo;Jesse D. Sengillo;Sally Justus;Thiago Cabral;Stephen H. Tsang;Vinit B. Mahajan;
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 13-13
236 views
Journament Score
29.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,382 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

16.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.