Indexed in Journament

regional anesthesia and pain medicine

ISSN 1532-8651· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,983 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
59 Articles
Scores higher than 55.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name reg anesth pain med
Abbreviated Name reg anesth pain med
ISSN 1532-8651

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 90.0
Diversity 35.2
Innovation 7.5
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 16.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity 35.2 22.2
Innovation 7.5 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.1
Content Distribution 16.1 88.7
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (59)

2019
Anterior quadratus lumborum block analgesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.
Kukreja, Promil;MacBeth, Lisa;Sturdivant, Adam;Morgan, Charity J;Ghanem, Elie;Kalagara, Hari;Chan, Vincent W S;
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pectoral nerve blocks and postoperative pain outcomes after mastectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Lovett-Carter, Danielle;Kendall, Mark C;McCormick, Zachary L;Suh, Edward I;Cohen, Alexander D;De Oliveira, Gildasio S;
339 views DOI Abstract
2018
Comparison of Paravertebral Block by Anatomic Landmark Technique to Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery Anesthesia
Patnaik, Rupali;Chhabra, Anjolie;Subramaniam, Rajeshwari;Arora, Mahesh K.;Goswami, Devalina;Srivastava, Anurag;Seenu, Vuthaluru;Dhar, Anita;
Vol. 43 , No. 4 , pp. 385-390
334 views DOI
2017
Pectoral Fascial (PECS) i and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
Yalamuri, S.
Vol. 42 , pp. 764-766
303 views DOI
1999
Paravertebral Somatic Nerve Block for Outpatient Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
&NA;, Given Name Unknow;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 96-97
277 views DOI
2015
A Novel Paralaminar In-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block Using Microconvex Array Transducer
Taketa, Yasuko;Fujitani, Taro;
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 390
265 views DOI
Impact of Video Technology for Improving Success of Medial Canthus Episcleral Anesthesia in Ophthalmology.
Guerrier, Gilles;Rothschild, Pierre-Raphaël;Lehmann, Mathieu;Azan, Frédéric;Baillard, Christophe;
Vol. 42 , No. 6 , pp. 757-759
263 views DOI Abstract
2007
A New Look at the Paravertebral Block: A Percutaneous Video-Assisted Technique
FELTRACCO, P;ORI, C;
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. 538-539
259 views DOI
2016
Parasternal, Pecto-intercostal, Pecs, and Transverse Thoracic Muscle Plane Blocks
Del, Buono R.
Vol. 41 , pp. 791-792
258 views DOI
2019
Problem with the Pecs II block: the long thoracic nerve is collateral damage.
Miller, Brett;Pawa, Amit;Mariano, Edward R;
Vol. 44 , pp. 817-818
233 views DOI
2026
Facial pain in patients with hemifacial spasm: A prospective cohort study
Míriam Carvalho Soares, Mariana de Almeida Cruz Silva, Clélia Maria Ribeiro Franco, Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha-Filho
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Assessment and Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain: A Multidisciplinary Clinical Practice Guideline
Andrea C. Skelly, Devan Kansagara, Jessica Oswald, Roger Chou, For the Acute Low Back Pain Guideline Project Guideline Development Group, Daniel P. Alford, James Babington, Andrew Chang, Beth Darnall, Mark Holtsman, Heather Jackson, Anthony Lisi, Tom Norris, Rosemary Carol Polomano, Sean D. Rundell, Raymond Teets, Erika Brodt, Ajay Wasan, Mark Wallace, Steven Cohen
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Does the National Resident Matching Program Rank List Predict Accreditation College of Graduate Medical Education Trainee Performance Among Multispecialty Pain Medicine Fellows? A Multicenter Study
Steven P. Cohen, Oludare Olatoye, Peter Schumaker, Dalia Elmofty, Heejung Choi, Bhavana Yalamuru, Lynn Kohan
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of different types of exercise on pain thresholds in patients with chronic low back pain: a crossover randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial
Rafael Ugarte, Pilar Alberola‐Zorrilla, Daniel Sánchez‐Zuriaga
30 views DOI Abstract
2026
Descriptive studies should not be interpreted as economic evaluations
Sara Olofsson, Maria L Rosén Klement, Antje M. Barreveld, Neel Mehta, Ulf Persson, Carl Borrebaeck
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Central Sensitization and Cognitive Vulnerability: A Neurobiological Framework for CNS Resilience and Brain Aging
Kevin V. Hackshaw
15 views DOI Abstract
2026
Considerations Regarding Comparator Selection and Long-Term Interpretation of Auricular Point Acupressure for Chronic Low Back Pain
ZiHao Yi
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Comparison of the Effects of Phenol Neurolysis and Conventional Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Applied to the Genicular Nerves on Pain in Patients Who Underwent Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Controlled Study
Devran Ertilav, Esra Ertilav
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Book Review: Deconstructing Toxic Narratives: Data, Disparities, and a New Path Forward in the Opioid Crisis
Nabarun Dasgupta
20 views DOI
2026
Patient-Reported Versus Pharmacy-Verified Naloxone Co-Prescription Fill Rates in a Chronic Pain Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Discordance Analysis
Gustaf Van Acker, Nafis Eghrari, Woo Jun Shim, Chong Kim
21 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,983 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

35.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

7.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

16.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.