Indexed in Journament

regional anesthesia and pain medicine

ISSN 1532-8651· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,637 of 29,299 scored journals (34,034 indexed)
84 Articles
Scores higher than 63.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name reg anesth pain med
Abbreviated Name reg anesth pain med
ISSN 1532-8651

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 100.0
Diversity 34.1
Innovation 7.5
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 23.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.6
Accessibility — 23.3
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 34.1 25.9
Innovation 7.5 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 6.6
Content Distribution 23.0 89.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (84)

2019
Anterior quadratus lumborum block analgesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.
Kukreja, Promil;MacBeth, Lisa;Sturdivant, Adam;Morgan, Charity J;Ghanem, Elie;Kalagara, Hari;Chan, Vincent W S;
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pectoral nerve blocks and postoperative pain outcomes after mastectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Lovett-Carter, Danielle;Kendall, Mark C;McCormick, Zachary L;Suh, Edward I;Cohen, Alexander D;De Oliveira, Gildasio S;
352 views DOI Abstract
2018
Comparison of Paravertebral Block by Anatomic Landmark Technique to Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery Anesthesia
Patnaik, Rupali;Chhabra, Anjolie;Subramaniam, Rajeshwari;Arora, Mahesh K.;Goswami, Devalina;Srivastava, Anurag;Seenu, Vuthaluru;Dhar, Anita;
Vol. 43 , No. 4 , pp. 385-390
349 views DOI
2017
Pectoral Fascial (PECS) i and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
Yalamuri, S.
Vol. 42 , pp. 764-766
328 views DOI
1999
Paravertebral Somatic Nerve Block for Outpatient Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
&NA;, Given Name Unknow;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 96-97
307 views DOI
2015
A Novel Paralaminar In-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block Using Microconvex Array Transducer
Taketa, Yasuko;Fujitani, Taro;
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 390
288 views DOI
Impact of Video Technology for Improving Success of Medial Canthus Episcleral Anesthesia in Ophthalmology.
Guerrier, Gilles;Rothschild, Pierre-Raphaël;Lehmann, Mathieu;Azan, Frédéric;Baillard, Christophe;
Vol. 42 , No. 6 , pp. 757-759
286 views DOI Abstract
2007
A New Look at the Paravertebral Block: A Percutaneous Video-Assisted Technique
FELTRACCO, P;ORI, C;
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. 538-539
278 views DOI
2016
Parasternal, Pecto-intercostal, Pecs, and Transverse Thoracic Muscle Plane Blocks
Del, Buono R.
Vol. 41 , pp. 791-792
276 views DOI
2019
Problem with the Pecs II block: the long thoracic nerve is collateral damage.
Miller, Brett;Pawa, Amit;Mariano, Edward R;
Vol. 44 , pp. 817-818
256 views DOI
2026
Acetaminophen and chronic post-surgical neuropathic pain: a randomized double blind cross-over study
Christelle Gimenez, Véronique Morel, Bruno Pereira, Marie‐Eva Pickering, Rosalie Bervas, Roger Knaggs, Nicolas Macian, Gisele P Pickering
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Noninvasive Diagnostic Ultrasound-Guided Focused Ultrasound-Induced Peripheral Nerve Blockade Attenuates Pain Behaviors in a Model of Chronic Inflammatory Pain
Namrata Sangwan, Lidia Mergelian, Michael Klukinov, Morteza Mohammadjavadi, Cholawat Pacharinsak, Kim Butts Pauly, David C. Yeomans, Thomas A. Anderson
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Corrigendum to: Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Treatment for Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Utilizing Image Guidance
12 views DOI
2026
Parasartorial Compartments (PASC) Block Added to Periarticular Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Yunus Oktay Atalay, Okkes Basak, Birzat Emre Gölboyu, Bahadır Çiftçi
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Beyond the Prescription - Integrating Addiction Counselors, Peer Support, and Clinical Teams in Complex Pain and Opioid Use Disorder
Alexandra Coffield, Jennifer B. Oliver, Heather Columbano, Enrique Galang, Elizabeth Hodges Shilling, Robert W. Hurley
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Twenty-Eight-Day Pain Trajectories After Standardized Three-Position Coccygeal Infiltration: A Prospective Observational Study of 274 Patients
Loreto C. Pulido, Philipp Koehl, Alexander Schuh, Hugo E J Vankelecom
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Perineural or intravenous dexamethasone for adductor canal and iPACK blocks in total knee arthroplasty: A randomised trial
Tomasz Reysner, Alicja Bartkowska‐Śniatkowska, Jowita Rosada-Kurasińska, Katarzyna Wieczorowska–Tobis, Przemysław Daroszewski, Małgorzata Domagalska
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Medicare and Medicaid Professional Fee Reimbursement for Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Analysis of National and State-level Trends
Evan J Mizerak, Jay V. Karri, David Anthony Provenzano, Lisa Goudman, Ryan Steven D'Souza
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Pilates combined with Cognitive Functional Therapy in women with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A three-arm randomized controlled trial on physical and psychological outcomes
Ali Yalfani, Zahra Raeisi, Nahid Bigdeli, Niloofar Rahimi
31 views DOI Abstract
2026
Preferences and Treatment Outcomes of a Whole Health Interdisciplinary Team Program for Chronic Pain Among Rural Veterans: the PREVAIL Cohort Study
Rena Elizabeth Courtney, Kathryn Bower, Alicia J Lozano, Mary Josephine Schadegg, Jody Caretti, Beth D. Darnall, Stephanie Smith, Rendelle E. Bolton, Henry Ryan Wagner, Krisann K. Oursler, Jennifer C. Naylor
14 views DOI
Journament Score
34.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,637 of 29,299 scored
(34,034 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

34.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

7.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

23.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.