regional anesthesia and pain medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3131 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
85
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

regional anesthesia and pain medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name reg anesth pain med
Abbreviated Name reg anesth pain med
ISSN 1532-8651
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (37 total)

2019
Anterior quadratus lumborum block analgesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.
Kukreja, Promil;MacBeth, Lisa;Sturdivant, Adam;Morgan, Charity J;Ghanem, Elie;Kalagara, Hari;Chan, Vincent W S;
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pectoral nerve blocks and postoperative pain outcomes after mastectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Lovett-Carter, Danielle;Kendall, Mark C;McCormick, Zachary L;Suh, Edward I;Cohen, Alexander D;De Oliveira, Gildasio S;
304 views DOI Abstract
2018
Comparison of Paravertebral Block by Anatomic Landmark Technique to Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery Anesthesia
Patnaik, Rupali;Chhabra, Anjolie;Subramaniam, Rajeshwari;Arora, Mahesh K.;Goswami, Devalina;Srivastava, Anurag;Seenu, Vuthaluru;Dhar, Anita;
Vol. 43 , No. 4 , pp. 385-390
298 views DOI
2017
Pectoral Fascial (PECS) i and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
Yalamuri, S.
Vol. 42 , pp. 764-766
268 views DOI
1999
Paravertebral Somatic Nerve Block for Outpatient Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
&NA;, Given Name Unknow;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 96-97
248 views DOI
2015
A Novel Paralaminar In-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block Using Microconvex Array Transducer
Taketa, Yasuko;Fujitani, Taro;
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 390
231 views DOI
2007
A New Look at the Paravertebral Block: A Percutaneous Video-Assisted Technique
FELTRACCO, P;ORI, C;
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. 538-539
231 views DOI
2016
Parasternal, Pecto-intercostal, Pecs, and Transverse Thoracic Muscle Plane Blocks
Del, Buono R.
Vol. 41 , pp. 791-792
226 views DOI
Impact of Video Technology for Improving Success of Medial Canthus Episcleral Anesthesia in Ophthalmology.
Guerrier, Gilles;Rothschild, Pierre-Raphaël;Lehmann, Mathieu;Azan, Frédéric;Baillard, Christophe;
Vol. 42 , No. 6 , pp. 757-759
221 views DOI Abstract
2019
Problem with the Pecs II block: the long thoracic nerve is collateral damage.
Miller, Brett;Pawa, Amit;Mariano, Edward R;
Vol. 44 , pp. 817-818
201 views DOI
View All 37 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
37
85
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

85.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.