ieee transactions on very large scale integration (vlsi) systems | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5540 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

ieee transactions on very large scale integration (vlsi) systems

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name ieee transactions on very large scale integration (vlsi) systems
Abbreviated Name ieee transactions on very large scale integration (vlsi) systems
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (7 total)

2020
association between cd47 expression, clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
;Oscar Arrieta;Alejandro Aviles‐Salas;Mario Orozco‐Morales;Norma Hernández‐Pedro;Andrés F. Cardona;Luis Cabrera‐Miranda;Pedro Barrios‐Bernal;Giovanny Soca‐Chafre;Graciela Cruz‐Rico;María de Lourdes Peña‐Torres;Guadalupe Moncada‐Claudio;Laura‐Alejandra Ramirez‐Tirado
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 2390-2402
329 views DOI Abstract
2020
pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin following concomitant intravenous administration of olaratumab (imc‐3g3) to patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma
;Victor M. Villalobos;Gary Mo;Mark Agulnik;Seth M. Pollack;Daniel A. Rushing;Arun Singh;Brian A. Van Tine;Rhian McNaughton;Rodney L. Decker;Wei Zhang;Ashwin Shahir;Damien M. Cronier
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 882-893
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
harnessing the patient voice in prostate cancer research: systematic review on the use of patient‐reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials to support clinical decision‐making
;Mieke Van Hemelrijck;Francesco Sparano;Lisa Moris;Katharina Beyer;Francesco Cottone;Mirjam Sprangers;Fabio Efficace
Vol. 9 , No. 12 , pp. 4039-4058
226 views DOI Abstract
2019
High-Volume Testing and DC Offset Trimming Technique of On-Die Bandgap Voltage Reference for SOCs and Microprocessors
Oshita, T.
Vol. 27 , pp. 821-829
217 views DOI
2016
A practical logic obfuscation technique for hardware security
Zhang, J.
Vol. 24 , pp. 1193-1197
187 views DOI
2010
Scitopia.org [advertisement]
No Author Found
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1504-1504
168 views DOI
2016
Low-Power Split-Radix FFT Processors Using Radix-2 Butterfly Units
Qian, Z.
Vol. 24 , pp. 3008-3012
148 views DOI
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.