powder technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#550 / 33,940
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

powder technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name powder technology
Abbreviated Name powder technology
ISSN 0032-5910
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/powder-technology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2017
utilization probiotic lactic acid bacteria fish from waste faeces on ldl level blood broiler chickens strain lohmann
;Astuti Astuti;Siti Umniyati;Anna Rakhmawati;Evy Yulianti
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 51-54
310 views Abstract
2019
Preparation, characterization, and application of magnetic activated carbon from termite feces for the adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions
Demarchi C.
Vol. 354 , pp. 432-441
267 views DOI
2018
Impact of spray drying over conventional surface adsorption technique for improvement in micromeritic and biopharmaceutical characteristics of self-nanoemulsifying powder loaded with two lipophilic as well as gastrointestinal labile drugs
Kumar, B.
Vol. 326 , pp. 425-442
243 views DOI
2019
Comprehensive assessment of the accuracy of CFD-DEM simulations of bubbling fluidized beds
Liu, D.
Vol. 343 , pp. 145-158
239 views DOI
2008
Development of catalytic tar decomposition downstream from a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier
Christoph Pfeifer,Hermann Hofbauer;Christoph Pfeifer;Hermann Hofbauer;
Vol. 180 , No. 1 , pp. 9-16
221 views DOI
2018
Influence of non-spherical shape approximation on DEM simulation accuracy by multi-sphere method
Khazeni, A.
Vol. 332 , pp. 265-278
191 views DOI
2019
Effect of SiO<inf>2</inf> nanoparticles on the heat transfer characteristics of refrigerant and tribological behaviour of lubricant
Sanukrishna, S.
Vol. 356 , pp. 39-49
177 views DOI
2011
Structural investigation of nanocrystalline BaTiO3 powders
V.P. Pavlovic,J. Krstic,M.J. Šćepanović,J. Dojcilovic,D.M. Minić,J. Blanusa,S. Stevanović,V.B. Pavlovic;V.P. Pavlovic;J. Krstic;M.J. Šćepanović;J. Dojcilovic;D.M. Minić;J. Blanusa;S. Stevanović;V.B. Pavlovic;
, pp. 1-
175 views DOI
1982
Correlation of moist strength with contact angles for polymer powder agglomerates
Omenyi, S.
Vol. 33 , pp. 167-174
174 views DOI
2018
Numerical prediction of wear in SAG mills based on DEM simulations
Xu, L.
Vol. 329 , pp. 353-363
166 views DOI
View All 13 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.