energy sources, part a: recovery, utilization and environmental effects | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3247 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

energy sources, part a: recovery, utilization and environmental effects

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name energy sources, part a: recovery, utilization and environmental effects
Abbreviated Name energy sources, part a: recovery, utilization and environmental effects
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (50 total)

2019
A comparative assessment of predicting CH <inf>4</inf> adsorption on different activated carbons using generalized regression neural network (GRNN), and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)
Yan H.
Vol. 41 , pp. 1983-1992
380 views DOI
2019
Prediction of CH <inf>4</inf> adsorption on different activated carbons by developing an optimal multilayer perceptron artificial neural network
Yang K.
Vol. 41 , pp. 2061-2072
323 views DOI
2019
Prediction of CO <inf>2</inf> adsorption on different activated carbons by hybrid group method of data-handling networks and LSSVM
Zhou L.
Vol. 41 , pp. 1960-1971
318 views DOI
2019
An iterative code to investigate heat pump performance improvement by exhaust gases heat recovery
Murr, R.
Vol. 41 , pp. 2207-2218
260 views DOI
2020
Design and construction of a micro-photo bioreactor in order to dairy wastewater treatment by micro-algae: parametric study
Valizadeh, K.
Vol. 42 , pp. 611-624
247 views DOI
2016
disorientasi politik dan peran intermediary kelas menengah to pulo: politik lokal di kepulauan selayar pasca orde baru
;Abu Bakar
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 210-222
245 views DOI Abstract
2019
Research on the calculation method of carbonate contents from logging data based on SPSS
Huang, R.
, pp. 0-0
228 views DOI
2016
pers mengawal demokrasi daerah: analisis pemberitaan implementasi dana keistimewaan di harian tribun jogja
;Niti Bayu Indrakrista
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 196-209
227 views DOI Abstract
2018
Preparation and surface modification of anhydrous calcium sulfate whiskers from FGD gypsum in autoclave-free hydrothermal system
Ma, X.
Vol. 40 , pp. 2055-2062
222 views DOI
2018
psychological analysis of jokowi’s first 100 days and nawacita from text in twitter
;Indro Adinugroho;Smitha Sjahputri;Judotens Budiarto;Roby Muhamad
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 173-187
222 views DOI Abstract
View All 50 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.