Indexed in Journament

monthly notices of the royal astronomical society

ISSN 0035-8711· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.0 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #144 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
1,125 Articles
Scores higher than 99.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name mon not r astron soc
Abbreviated Name monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
ISSN 0035-8711
URL http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 86.7 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.3
Content Distribution 31.6 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (1,125)

2014
Model-based asymptotically optimal dispersion measure correction for pulsar timing
K. J. Lee,C. G. Bassa,G. H. Janssen,R. Karuppusamy,Michael Kramer,K. Liu,Delphine Perrodin,R. Smits,B. W. Stappers,R. Van Haasteren,L. Lentati;K. J. Lee;C. G. Bassa;G. H. Janssen;R. Karuppusamy;Michael Kramer;K. Liu;Delphine Perrodin;R. Smits;B. W. Stappers;R. Van Haasteren;L. Lentati;
Vol. 441 , No. 4 , pp. 2831-2844
316 views DOI Abstract
2012
Erratum: Placing limits on the stochastic gravitational-wave background using European Pulsar Timing Array data
R. Van Haasteren,Y. Levin,G. H. Janssen,K. Lazaridis,M. Kramer,B. W. Stappers,G. Desvignes,M. B. Purver,A. G. Lyne,R. D. Ferdman,A. Jessner,I. Cognard,G. Theureau,N. D'amico,A. Possenti,Marta Burgay,Alessandro Corongiu,J. W. T. Hessels,R. Smits,J. P. W. Verbiest;R. Van Haasteren;Y. Levin;G. H. Janssen;K. Lazaridis;M. Kramer;B. W. Stappers;G. Desvignes;M. B. Purver;A. G. Lyne;R. D. Ferdman;A. Jessner;I. Cognard;G. Theureau;N. D'amico;A. Possenti;Marta Burgay;Alessandro Corongiu;J. W. T. Hessels;R. Smits;J. P. W. Verbiest;
Vol. 425 , No. 2 , pp. 1597-
295 views DOI Abstract
2018
Strategies for the follow-up of gravitational wave transients with the Cherenkov Telescope Array
I Bartoš,T Di Girolamo,J R Gair,M Hendry,I S Heng,T B Humensky,S Marka,Z Márka,C Messenger,R Mukherjee,D Nieto,P O'brien,M Santander;I Bartoš;T Di Girolamo;J R Gair;M Hendry;I S Heng;T B Humensky;S Marka;Z Márka;C Messenger;R Mukherjee;D Nieto;P O'brien;M Santander;
Vol. 477 , No. 1 , pp. 639-647
291 views DOI Abstract
2016
FR II radio galaxies at low frequencies - I. Morphology, magnetic field strength and energetics.
Harwood, Jeremy J;Croston, Judith H;Intema, Huib T;Stewart, Adam J;Ineson, Judith;Hardcastle, Martin J;Godfrey, Leith;Best, Philip;Brienza, Marisa;Heesen, Volker;Mahony, Elizabeth K;Morganti, Raffaella;Murgia, Matteo;Orrú, Emanuela;Röttgering, Huub;Shulevski, Aleksandar;Wise, Michael W;
Vol. 458 , No. 4 , pp. 4443-4455
285 views Abstract
2019
Low-frequency Faraday rotation measures towards pulsars using LOFAR: Probing the 3D Galactic halo magnetic field
Sobey, C.
Vol. 484 , pp. 3646-3664
284 views DOI
2016
Low-radio-frequency eclipses of the redback pulsar J2215+5135 observed in the image plane with LOFAR.
Broderick, J W;Fender, R P;Breton, R P;Stewart, A J;Rowlinson, A;Swinbank, J D;Hessels, J W T;Staley, T D;van der Horst, A J;Bell, M E;Carbone, D;Cendes, Y;Corbel, S;Eislöffel, J;Falcke, H;Grießmeier, J-M;Hassall, T E;Jonker, P;Kramer, M;Kuniyoshi, M;Law, C J;Markoff, S;Molenaar, G J;Pietka, M;Scheers, L H A;Serylak, M;Stappers, B W;Ter Veen, S;van Leeuwen, J;Wijers, R A M J;Wijnands, R;Wise, M W;Zarka, P;
Vol. 459 , No. 3 , pp. 2681-2689
282 views Abstract
2019
A many-core CPU prototype of an MCAO and LTAO RTC for ELT-scale instruments
Jenkins, D.
Vol. 485 , pp. 5142-5152
267 views DOI
2004
Lagrangian perturbation theory of non-relativistic rotating superfluid stars
N. Andersson,Gregory Comer,K. Grosart;N. Andersson;Gregory Comer;K. Grosart;
Vol. 355 , No. 3 , pp. 918-928
265 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nature versus nurture: What regulates star formation in satellite galaxies?
De, Lucia G.
Vol. 482 , pp. 5041-5051
257 views DOI
2003
The oscillation and stability of differentially rotating spherical shells: the normal-mode problem
A. L. Watts,N. Andersson,H. Beyer,B. F. Schutz;A. L. Watts;N. Andersson;H. Beyer;B. F. Schutz;
Vol. 342 , No. 4 , pp. 1156-1168
254 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Physical Origins of Scatter in the Dust Attenuation Scaling Relation of Star-Forming Galaxies: Star–Dust Geometry
Zongfei Lyu, Xian Zhong Zheng, Zhizheng Pan, Antonios Katsianis, Stijn Wuyts, Haiguang Xu, Pedro Cataldi, Wenhao Liu, Man Qiao, Dong Shi, Yuheng Zhang, Shuang Liu, Run Wen, Chao Yang
DOI Abstract
2026
Radiating Bondi Flows II: Giant Planet Accretion Models
Avery P. Bailey, Kaitlin Kratter, Andrew N. Youdin
DOI Abstract
2026
Radiating Bondi Flows I: Dimensionless Framework and Constant Opacity Solutions
Avery P. Bailey, Andrew N. Youdin, Kaitlin Kratter
DOI Abstract
2026
Heavy black hole seed survivors in dwarf galaxies: a case study of Leo I
Matthew T. Scoggins, Zoltán Haiman, Fabio Pacucci
DOI Abstract
2026
The galaxy ultraviolet luminosity function from z = 7 to 20 in the COLIBRE simulations
Shengdong Lu, Carlos S. Frenk, Cedric G. Lacey, Andrea Gebek, Joop Schaye, Shaun Cole, Sownak Bose, Anna Durrant, Nick Andreadis, M. Baes, Alejandro Benítez-Llambay, Evgenii Chaikin, Camila A. Correa, Robert A. Crain, Filip Huško, Robert J. McGibbon, Sylvia Ploeckinger, Alexander J. Richings, Matthieu Schaller, James W. Trayford
DOI Abstract
2026
A Truncation Test of the DESI Evolving Dark Energy Signal: Three Supernova Calibrations Compared
Tao Zhang
DOI Abstract
2026
Sky-Plane Velocity Distributions of Interstellar Objects and Implications for Their Detection
Cassidy Walker, Darryl Z. Seligman
DOI Abstract
2026
Three New Likely Spider Millisecond Pulsar Binaries and Optical Kinematic Tracers of Intrabinary Shocks
Jay Strader, Rebecca Kyer, Laura B. Chomiuk, E. Aydi, Peter Craig, Thomas Do, I. Molina, Teresa Panurach, Subhroja Roy, K. V. Sokolovsky, Samuel J. Swihart, Ryan T Urquhart
DOI Abstract
2026
Detection of relativistic orbital deformation from improved timing of PSR J1757−1854
Jaikhomba Singha, V. Venkatraman Krishnan, Marisa Geyer, Victoria Blackmon, P C C Freire, Norbert Wex, M. A. McLaughlin, M. Kramer, Amanda Weltman, D. J. Champion, M. Bailes, Sarah Buchner, Fernando Camilo, Andrea Possenti, M. Serylak
DOI Abstract
2026
Efficiently emulating distribution functions in gigaparsec volumes for varying cosmological parameters
Christopher C. Lovell, Max E. Lee, William J Roper, Daniel Anglés‐Alcázar, Shy Genel, Shivam Pandey, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro
DOI Abstract
Journament Score
50.0/100 · Average
Ranked #144 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

50.0/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

86.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

31.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.