Indexed in Journament

natural hazards and earth system sciences

ISSN 1561-8633· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,952 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 86.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name natural hazards and earth system sciences
Abbreviated Name natural hazards and earth system sciences
ISSN 1561-8633

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 55.6
Innovation 40.5
Community Impact 11.4
Content Distribution 60.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 55.6 24.4
Innovation 40.5 25.7
Community Impact 11.4 5.8
Content Distribution 60.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2018
Characteristics and frequency of large submarine landslides at the western tip of the Gulf of Corinth
Beckers, A.;Beckers, A.;Beckers, A.;Hubert-Ferrari, A.;Beck, C.;Papatheodorou, G.;Batist, M. de;Sakellariou, D.;Tripsanas, E.;Demoulin, A.;
Vol. 18 , pp. 1411-1425
435 views Abstract
2018
Going beyond the flood insurance rate map: insights from flood hazard map co-production
Luke, A.;Sanders, B. F.;Sanders, B. F.;Goodrich, K. A.;Feldman, D. L.;Boudreau, D.;Eguiarte, A.;Serrano, K.;Reyes, A.;Schubert, J. E.;AghaKouchak, A.;Basolo, V.;Matthew, R. A.;
Vol. 18 , pp. 1097-1120
434 views Abstract
2019
Landslide susceptibility mapping by using a geographic information system (GIS) along the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (Karakoram Highway), Pakistan
Ali, S.;Ali, S.;Biermanns, P.;Haider, R.;Reicherter, K.;
Vol. 19 , pp. 999-1022
404 views Abstract
2012
Estimation of the daily water consumption by maize under Atlantic climatic conditions (A Coruña, NW Spain) using Frequency Domain Reflectometry – a case study
Mestas-Valero, R. M.;Mirás-Avalos, J. M.;Vidal-Vázquez, E.;
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 709-714
385 views Abstract
2019
Flood risk assessment due to cyclone-induced dike breaching in coastal areas of Bangladesh
Feroz, Islam M.
Vol. 19 , pp. 353-368
375 views DOI
2013
Mapping tsunami impacts on land cover and related ecosystem service supply in Phang Nga, Thailand
Kaiser, G.;Burkhard, B.;Römer, H.;Sangkaew, S.;Graterol, R.;Haitook, T.;Sterr, H.;Sakuna-Schwartz, D.;
Vol. 13 , No. 12 , pp. 3095-3111
369 views Abstract
2017
Data assimilation of Argo profiles in a northwestern Pacific model
Wang, Z.;Storto, A.;Pinardi, N.;Liu, G.;Wang, H.;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 17-30
366 views Abstract
2008
Disturbances in VHF/UHF telemetry links as a possible effect of the 2003 Hokkaido Tokachi-oki earthquake
Nagamoto, H.;Fukushima, T.;Ida, Y.;Matsudo, Y.;Hayakawa, M.;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 813-817
310 views Abstract
2013
Evaluation of seismo-electric anomalies using magnetic data in Taiwan
Chen, C. H.;Hsu, H. L.;Wen, S.;Yeh, T. K.;Chang, F. Y.;Wang, C. H.;Liu, J. Y.;Sun, Y. Y.;Hattori, K.;Yen, H. Y.;Han, P.;
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 597-604
304 views Abstract
2006
Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks
Büchele, B.;Büchele, B.;Kreibich, H.;Kron, A.;Kron, A.;Thieken, A.;Ihringer, J.;Oberle, P.;Merz, B.;Nestmann, F.;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 485-503
302 views Abstract
2024
Surface rupture kinematics of the 2020 <i>M</i><sub>w</sub>&thinsp;6.6 Masbate (Philippines) earthquake determined from optical and radar data
Rita, K. S. Sta.;Valkaniotis, S.;Lagmay, A. M. F.;Lagmay, A. M. F.;
Vol. 24 , pp. 1135-1161
61 views Abstract
2024
Surface rupture kinematics of the 2020 Mwg6.6 Masbate (Philippines) earthquake determined from optical and radar data
Khelly, K.S.
Vol. 24 , pp. 1135-1161
57 views DOI
2020
Forecasting flood hazards in real time: a surrogate model for hydrometeorological events in an Andean watershed
María Teresa Contreras;Jorge Gironás;Cristián Escauriaza;
Vol. 20 , No. 12 , pp. 3261-3277
208 views DOI Abstract
2019
Landslide susceptibility mapping by using a geographic information system (GIS) along the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (Karakoram Highway), Pakistan
Ali, S.;Ali, S.;Biermanns, P.;Haider, R.;Reicherter, K.;
Vol. 19 , pp. 999-1022
404 views Abstract
2019
Flood risk assessment due to cyclone-induced dike breaching in coastal areas of Bangladesh
Feroz, Islam M.
Vol. 19 , pp. 353-368
375 views DOI
2018
Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016
Froude, Melanie J.;Petley, David N.;
Vol. 18 , No. 8 , pp. 2161-2181
35 views Abstract
2018
Characteristics and frequency of large submarine landslides at the western tip of the Gulf of Corinth
Beckers, A.;Beckers, A.;Beckers, A.;Hubert-Ferrari, A.;Beck, C.;Papatheodorou, G.;Batist, M. de;Sakellariou, D.;Tripsanas, E.;Demoulin, A.;
Vol. 18 , pp. 1411-1425
435 views Abstract
2018
Going beyond the flood insurance rate map: insights from flood hazard map co-production
Luke, A.;Sanders, B. F.;Sanders, B. F.;Goodrich, K. A.;Feldman, D. L.;Boudreau, D.;Eguiarte, A.;Serrano, K.;Reyes, A.;Schubert, J. E.;AghaKouchak, A.;Basolo, V.;Matthew, R. A.;
Vol. 18 , pp. 1097-1120
434 views Abstract
2018
Extreme heat in India and anthropogenic climate change
Oldenborgh, G. J. van;Philip, S.;Kew, S.;Weele, M. van;Uhe, P.;Uhe, P.;Otto, F.;Singh, R.;Pai, I.;Pai, I.;Cullen, H.;AchutaRao, K.;
Vol. 18 , pp. 365-381
180 views Abstract
2017
Data assimilation of Argo profiles in a northwestern Pacific model
Wang, Z.;Storto, A.;Pinardi, N.;Liu, G.;Wang, H.;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 17-30
366 views Abstract
Journament Score
37.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,952 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.