acta horticulturae | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1046 / 33,931
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated há 3 dias

acta horticulturae

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexacoes
scopus
Nome Abreviado acta horticulturae
Nome Abreviado acta horticulturae
ISSN 0
Objetivo e Escopo
URL
Instrucoes para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (62 total)

2010
Isolation of a fruit weight 2.2 (fw2.2) homolog in 'hass' avocado and characterization of its expression as related to reduced cell division and small fruit phenotype
Dahan Y.
Vol. 884 , pp. 145-152
378 views
2010
Textural, biochemical and micro-structural changes in mesocarp tissue of imported avocado from Peru during ripening
Landahl S.
Vol. 877 , pp. 1063-1070
366 views DOI
2017
Effect of spray and/or soil application of paclobutrazol, and spray application of potassium nitrate during flowering on new shoot growth and cropping of 'Mendez' avocado
Oosthuyse S.
Vol. 1178 , pp. 81-84
364 views DOI
2010
Evaluation of shelf life and ripening of imported avocado 'Hass' fruit following treatment with E+<sup>®</sup>Ethylene Remover or 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) during medium-term cold storage
Meyer M.
Vol. 877 , pp. 1049-1056
347 views DOI
2010
Dynamic controlled atmosphere storage of New Zealand-grown 'Hass' avocado fruit
Burdon J.
Vol. 876 , pp. 47-54
338 views DOI
2010
Effect of ethylene suppression on heptose sugars metabolism and ripening in avocado 'hass' fruit
Meyer M.
Vol. 884 , pp. 87-94
322 views DOI
2016
Landscape element application guidelines for physical therapy exercise
Siriphanich, S.
Vol. 1121 , pp. 69-78
302 views DOI
2017
Glasshouse studies of inherent root growth of seedling avocado rootstock cultivars
Neilsen M.
Vol. 1178 , pp. 35-40
301 views DOI
2005
EVALUATION OF IMMUNOASSAYS FOR DETECTION OF RALSTONIA SOLANACEARUM, CAUSAL AGENT OF BACTERIAL WILT OF TOMATO AND EGGPLANT IN THE PHILIPPINES
Opina, N.L.;Miller, S.A.;
, No. 6 , pp. 353-356
298 views DOI
2010
A systems approach to mitigate oriental fruit fly risk in 'sharwil' avocados exported from Hawaii
Follett P.
Vol. 880 , pp. 439-446
296 views
View All 62 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.