Indexed in Journament

asian journal of chemistry

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,110 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
179 Articles
Scores higher than 34.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name asian journal of chemistry
Abbreviated Name asian journal of chemistry

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 64.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for asian journal of chemistry
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 2.9 4.2
Content Distribution 64.8 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (179)

2016
assessment of background gamma radiation and determination of excess lifetime cancer risk in sabzevar city, iran in 2014
Vol. 73 , No. 10 , pp. 751-755
604 views Abstract
2016
profile of neonatal mortality in iran in 1391
Vol. 74 , No. 7 , pp. 475-482
579 views Abstract
2013
comparison of ultrasonography with radiography for the detection of cervical esophageal foreign body
Vol. 71 , No. 4 , pp. 224-229
563 views Abstract
2015
tumoral calcinosis: case report
Vol. 72 , No. 12 , pp. 865-869
543 views Abstract
2014
radiosensitivity of radioresistant colorectal cancer cells after treatment with docosahexaenoic acid and irradiation
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. 139-146
497 views Abstract
2016
defining reference range for tsh, ft4, t4 hormones used in screening neonatal hypothyroidism in a referral center in tehran
Vol. 73 , No. 10 , pp. 744-750
482 views Abstract
2015
uncommon toxicity of low-dose methotrexate: case report
Vol. 73 , No. 7 , pp. 540-543
479 views Abstract
2014
shoulder pain following laparoscopic: a randomized clinical trial: a brief report
Vol. 72 , No. 2 , pp. 129-133
433 views Abstract
2007
efficacy of single-dose methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a clinical trial
Vol. 65 , No. 8 , pp. 35-39
426 views Abstract
2007
correlation between urine analysis and urine culture in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in yazd central laboratory
Vol. 65 , No. 9 , pp. 53-58
407 views Abstract
2018
diabetes bus: benefits and difficulties: letters to the editor
Vol. 75 , No. 11 , pp. 848-848
184 views
2018
effects of tension of kinesio taping application on maximum quadriceps torque and knee repositioning sense in recreationally males
Vol. 76 , No. 1 , pp. 49-57
233 views Abstract
Journament Score
29.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,110 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.