asian journal of chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1931 / 33,944
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

asian journal of chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name asian journal of chemistry
Abbreviated Name asian journal of chemistry
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (179 total)

2016
assessment of background gamma radiation and determination of excess lifetime cancer risk in sabzevar city, iran in 2014
;Akbar Eslami;Mohammad Hossien Saghi;Ayob Rastegar
Vol. 73 , No. 10 , pp. 751-755
562 views Abstract
2016
profile of neonatal mortality in iran in 1391
;Mohammad Ali Heidarnia;Alireza Abadi;Mohamad Fsmaeil Motlagh;Mohammad Heidarzadeh;Abbas Habibelahi;Farima Raji
Vol. 74 , No. 7 , pp. 475-482
520 views Abstract
2013
comparison of ultrasonography with radiography for the detection of cervical esophageal foreign body
;Reza Pourrashidi;Shervin Sharifkashani ;Hashem Sharifian;Habib Mazaher ;Peyman Salamati ;Batool Ghorbani yekta
Vol. 71 , No. 4 , pp. 224-229
520 views Abstract
2015
tumoral calcinosis: case report
;Farhad Tafaghodi ;Ali Zamani ;Seyede Sabereh Mousavi
Vol. 72 , No. 12 , pp. 865-869
487 views Abstract
2014
radiosensitivity of radioresistant colorectal cancer cells after treatment with docosahexaenoic acid and irradiation
;Farideh Hosseini;Mohammad Reza Sam ;Nasrollah Jabbari
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. 139-146
450 views Abstract
2016
defining reference range for tsh, ft4, t4 hormones used in screening neonatal hypothyroidism in a referral center in tehran
;Alireza Abdollahi;Zohreh-Sadat Rozati
Vol. 73 , No. 10 , pp. 744-750
420 views Abstract
2015
uncommon toxicity of low-dose methotrexate: case report
;Zohreh Yousefi;Golrokh Sherafati;Azar Fani
Vol. 73 , No. 7 , pp. 540-543
409 views Abstract
2007
efficacy of single-dose methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a clinical trial
;Behnamfar F.;Yazdani SH.;Sakhaee M.
Vol. 65 , No. 8 , pp. 35-39
394 views Abstract
2014
shoulder pain following laparoscopic: a randomized clinical trial: a brief report
;Ali Zahedian;Mohsen Shoja ;Hadi Mollazade;Masoomeh Taiebi
Vol. 72 , No. 2 , pp. 129-133
393 views Abstract
2007
correlation between urine analysis and urine culture in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in yazd central laboratory
;Khalili M B;Sharifi Yazdi M K;Ebadi M;Sadeh M
Vol. 65 , No. 9 , pp. 53-58
375 views Abstract
View All 179 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.