Indexed in Journament

frontiers in behavioral neuroscience

ISSN 1662-5153· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.6/100
Journament Score
#8,182
Journament Rank
27
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name front behav neurosci
Abbreviated Name front behav neurosci
ISSN 1662-5153
URL http://www.frontiersin.org/behavioral_neuroscience

Indexings

ncbi doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2014
Navigating to new frontiers in behavioral neuroscience: traditional neuropsychological tests predict human performance on a rodent-inspired radial-arm maze.
Vol. 8 , pp. 294
486 views DOI Abstract
2017
Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments.
Vol. 11 , pp. 238
484 views DOI Abstract
2019
Separating Probability and Reversal Learning in a Novel Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task for Mice.
Vol. 13 , pp. 270
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
Behavioral Traits Associated With Resilience to the Effects of Repeated Social Defeat on Cocaine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference in Mice.
Vol. 13 , pp. 278
427 views DOI Abstract
2012
A rat model of post-traumatic stress disorder reproduces the hippocampal deficits seen in the human syndrome
Vol. 6 , pp. -
391 views Abstract
2019
Modulating the Activity of MPFC With tDCS Alters Endowment Effect.
Vol. 13 , pp. 211
362 views DOI Abstract
2011
Interpersonal stress regulation and the development of anxiety disorders: an attachment-based developmental framework
Vol. 5 , pp. -
355 views Abstract
2015
Distinct BOLD Activation Profiles Following Central and Peripheral Oxytocin Administration in Awake Rats.
Vol. 9 , pp. 245
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of Threat Expression Following Infant Maltreatment: Infant and Adult Enhancement but Adolescent Attenuation.
Vol. 13 , pp. 130
343 views DOI Abstract
2014
Induction of aversive learning through thermogenetic activation of Kenyon cell ensembles in Drosophila
Vol. 8 , pp. -
323 views Abstract
2022
Evidence That Nine Autistic Women Out of Ten Have Been Victims of Sexual Violence.
Vol. 16 , pp. 852203
71 views DOI Abstract
2019
Autonomic and Redox Imbalance Correlates With T-Lymphocyte Inflammation in a Model of Chronic Social Defeat Stress
Vol. 13 , pp. -
148 views Abstract
2019
Separating Probability and Reversal Learning in a Novel Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task for Mice.
Vol. 13 , pp. 270
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
Behavioral Traits Associated With Resilience to the Effects of Repeated Social Defeat on Cocaine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference in Mice.
Vol. 13 , pp. 278
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ecological Stoichiometry: A Link Between Developmental Speed and Physiological Stress in an Omnivorous Insect.
Vol. 13 , pp. 42
221 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modulating the Activity of MPFC With tDCS Alters Endowment Effect.
Vol. 13 , pp. 211
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of Threat Expression Following Infant Maltreatment: Infant and Adult Enhancement but Adolescent Attenuation.
Vol. 13 , pp. 130
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Testing Motivational Theories in Music Education: The Role of Effort and Gratitude.
Vol. 13 , pp. 172
221 views DOI Abstract
2018
in memoriam: harry van oorschot
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 37-38
3 views DOI Abstract
2018
large male bias in collection of micropterix facetella zeller, 1851 (lepidoptera, micropterigidae)
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 119-123
75 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.