Indexed in Journament

American journal of speech-language pathology

ISSN 1558-9110· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,525 of 29,297 scored journals (34,017 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 94.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Am J Speech Lang Pathol
Abbreviated Name am j speech lang pathol
ISSN 1558-9110
URL http://ajslp.asha.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 60.0 3.0
Diversity 37.7 26.1
Innovation 57.0 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.9
Content Distribution 72.7 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2019
The Effect of Working Memory Training on a Clinical Marker of French-Speaking Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
Stanford, Emily;Durrleman, Stephanie;Delage, Hélène;
, pp. 1-23
507 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a Free Online Interactive Naming Therapy for Bilingual Aphasia.
Sandberg, Chaleece;Gray, Teresa;Kiran, Swathi;
, pp. 1-10
474 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Dysphagia After Lateral Medullary Infarction: A Case Report.
Yuan, Ying;Wang, Jie;Wu, Dongyu;Zhang, Dahua;Song, Weiqun;
, pp. 1-7
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lexical-Level Predictors of Reading Comprehension in Third Grade: Is Spelling a Unique Contributor?
Murphy, Kimberly A;Justice, Laura M;
, pp. 1-14
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Text-to-Speech Rate on Reading Comprehension by Adults With Aphasia.
Hux, Karen;Brown, Jessica A;Wallace, Sarah;Knollman-Porter, Kelly;Saylor, Anna;Lapp, Erica;
, pp. 1-17
439 views DOI Abstract
2019
Facilitator Behaviors Leading to Engagement and Disengagement in Aphasia Conversation Groups.
Lee, Jaime B;Azios, Jamie H;
, pp. 1-19
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reading Outcomes for Individuals With Histories of Suspected Childhood Apraxia of Speech.
Miller, Gabrielle J;Lewis, Barbara;Benchek, Penelope;Freebairn, Lisa;Tag, Jessica;Budge, Karlie;Iyengar, Sudha K;Voss-Hoynes, Heather;Taylor, H Gerry;Stein, Catherine;
, pp. 1-16
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Profiling Speech Sound Disorders for Clinical Validation of the Computer Articulation Instrument.
van Haaften, Leenke;Diepeveen, Sanne;Terband, Hayo;Vermeij, Bernadette;van den Engel-Hoek, Lenie;de Swart, Bert;Maassen, Ben;
Vol. 28 , No. 2S , pp. 844-856
380 views DOI Abstract
2021
Applying the transtheoretical model to stuttering management among adolescents: Part ii. exploratory scale validation
Rodgers, N.H.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2510-2527
320 views DOI Abstract
2021
Applying the transtheoretical model to stuttering management among adolescents: Part I. scale development
Zebrowski, P.M.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2492-2509
275 views DOI
2025
Quantity and Complexity of Speech-Language Pathologists' Talk During School-Based Therapy.
Sun, Jing; Justice, Laura M; Jhuo, Rong-An; Jiang, Hui
Vol. 34 , pp. 646-660
69 views DOI Abstract
2021
Parents’ perceptions of the overall impact of stuttering on young children
Guttormsen, L.S.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2130-2142
154 views DOI
2021
Applying the transtheoretical model to stuttering management among adolescents: Part ii. exploratory scale validation
Rodgers, N.H.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2510-2527
320 views DOI Abstract
2021
Applying the transtheoretical model to stuttering management among adolescents: Part I. scale development
Zebrowski, P.M.
Vol. 30 , pp. 2492-2509
275 views DOI
2019
Development of a Free Online Interactive Naming Therapy for Bilingual Aphasia.
Sandberg, Chaleece;Gray, Teresa;Kiran, Swathi;
, pp. 1-10
474 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Text-to-Speech Rate on Reading Comprehension by Adults With Aphasia.
Hux, Karen;Brown, Jessica A;Wallace, Sarah;Knollman-Porter, Kelly;Saylor, Anna;Lapp, Erica;
, pp. 1-17
439 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reading Outcomes for Individuals With Histories of Suspected Childhood Apraxia of Speech.
Miller, Gabrielle J;Lewis, Barbara;Benchek, Penelope;Freebairn, Lisa;Tag, Jessica;Budge, Karlie;Iyengar, Sudha K;Voss-Hoynes, Heather;Taylor, H Gerry;Stein, Catherine;
, pp. 1-16
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lexical-Level Predictors of Reading Comprehension in Third Grade: Is Spelling a Unique Contributor?
Murphy, Kimberly A;Justice, Laura M;
, pp. 1-14
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Dysphagia After Lateral Medullary Infarction: A Case Report.
Yuan, Ying;Wang, Jie;Wu, Dongyu;Zhang, Dahua;Song, Weiqun;
, pp. 1-7
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effect of Working Memory Training on a Clinical Marker of French-Speaking Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
Stanford, Emily;Durrleman, Stephanie;Delage, Hélène;
, pp. 1-23
507 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,525 of 29,297 scored
(34,017 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

57.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.