Indexed in Journament

the journal of physical chemistry b

ISSN 1520-5207· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,830 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
42 Articles
Scores higher than 8.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j phys chem b
Abbreviated Name j phys chem b
ISSN 1520-5207
URL http://pubs.acs.org/journals/jpcbfk/index.html

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the journal of physical chemistry b
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 16.7 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 26.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (42)

2002
The Optical Properties of Metal Nanoparticles:  The Influence of Size, Shape, and Dielectric Environment
10,402 views DOI
2019
Spontaneous Crystallization of a Supercooled Lennard-Jones Liquid: Molecular Dynamics Simulation.
476 views DOI Abstract
2017
In Situ Characterization of Pharmaceutical Formulations by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Enhanced MAS NMR.
Vol. 121 , No. 34 , pp. 8132-8141
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
Promotion Effect of Succinimide on Amyloid Fibrillation of Hen Egg-White Lysozyme.
Vol. 123 , No. 38 , pp. 8057-8064
452 views DOI Abstract
2010
Nucleation of an oil phase in a nonionic microemulsion-containing chlorinated oil upon systematic temperature quench.
Vol. 114 , No. 23 , pp. 7769-76
451 views DOI Abstract
2013
Cyclodextrin-complexation effects on the low-frequency vibrational dynamics of ibuprofen by combined inelastic light and neutron scattering experiments.
Vol. 117 , No. 14 , pp. 3917-26
448 views DOI Abstract
2014
Preferential molecular encapsulation of an ICT fluorescence probe in the supramolecular cage of cucurbit[7]uril and β-cyclodextrin: an experimental and theoretical approach.
Vol. 118 , No. 46 , pp. 13279-89
442 views DOI Abstract
2020
Inclusion Complexation of Organic Micropollutants with β-Cyclodextrin.
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Untangling Hydrogen Bond Networks with Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Quantum Chemical Calculations: A Case Study on HXPGG.
Vol. 123 , No. 27 , pp. 5730-5741
413 views DOI Abstract
2020
Drying and Crystallization of Evaporating Sodium Nitrate Aerosol Droplets.
237 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Effects of Glucosylation and O-Acetylation on the Conformation of Serogroup 2 O-Antigen Vaccine Targets.
312 views DOI Abstract
2020
Inclusion Complexation of Organic Micropollutants with β-Cyclodextrin.
425 views DOI Abstract
2020
Central-Moments-Based Lattice Boltzmann for Associating Fluids: A New Integrated Approach.
190 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Enhancement of Metal-Binding Properties in Hemoglobin: The Role of Mild Damaging Factors.
Vol. 123 , No. 40 , pp. 8370-8377
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying and Tracking Defects in Dynamic Supramolecular Polymers.
173 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,830 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

25.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

16.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

26.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.