Arquivos de gastroenterologia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2194 / 33,972
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Arquivos de gastroenterologia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name Arq Gastroenterol
Abbreviated Name arquivos de gastroenterologia
ISSN 1678-4219
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0004-2803&lng=en&nrm=iso
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2017
the detection of proximal colon polyps and its importance in screening colonoscopy
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 219-223
450 views DOI Abstract
2012
Supplementation with 0.1% and 2% vitamin e in diabetic rats: analysis of myenteric neurons immunostained for myosin-V and nNOS in the jejunum
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 284-290
363 views Abstract
2019
RELATIONSHIP AMONG PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING, RESILIENCE AND COPING WITH SOCIAL AND CLINICAL FEATURES IN CROHN'S DISEASE PATIENTS.
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 131-140
347 views DOI Abstract
2013
FIRST SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC PANCREATECTOMY IN BRAZIL
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 310-312
343 views Abstract
2019
IMMUNIZATION STATUS OF PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE.
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 124-130
317 views DOI Abstract
2012
Acute diarrhea in hospitalized children of the municipality of juiz de fora, MG, Brazil: prevalence and risk factors associated with disease severity
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 259-265
311 views Abstract
INAPPROPRIATE USAGE OF INTRAVENOUS PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS IN A HIGH COMPLEXITY HOSPITAL IN BRAZIL.
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 32-38
307 views DOI Abstract
2003
O esôfago de Barrett associado à estenose cáustica do esôfago Barrett's esophagus associated to caustic stenosis of the esophagus
Vol. 40 , No. 3 , pp. 148-151
286 views Abstract
2019
A STUDY OF METABOLIC PARAMETERS IN NON DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH NON ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE - IMPORTANCE OF DYSLIPIDEMIA.
Vol. 56 , No. 3 , pp. 270-275
255 views DOI Abstract
2014
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF OLDER OBESE PATIENTS CANDIDATES FOR BARIATRIC SURGERY
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 25-28
80 views Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.