Indexed in Journament

bmc neurology

ISSN 1471-2377· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,282 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 78.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name bmc neurol
Abbreviated Name bmc neurology
ISSN 1471-2377
URL https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for bmc neurology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 51.1 25.8
Innovation 60.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.7 7.8
Content Distribution 76.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2018
Bilateral oculomotor ocular neuromyotonia: a case report
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-4
621 views Abstract
2017
Research on advanced intervention using novel bone marrOW stem cell (RAINBOW): a study protocol for a phase I, open-label, uncontrolled, dose-response trial of autologous bone marrow stromal cell transplantation in patients with acute ischemic stroke
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
490 views Abstract
2019
COGTIPS: a double-blind randomized active controlled trial protocol to study the effect of home-based, online cognitive training on cognition and brain networks in Parkinson's disease.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 179
480 views DOI Abstract
2019
The protocol-guided rapid evaluation of veterans experiencing new transient neurological symptoms (PREVENT) quality improvement program: rationale and methods.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 294
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Irreversible fatal contrast-induced encephalopathy: a case report
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
434 views Abstract
2018
Hyperuricemia and dementia – a case-control study
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
418 views Abstract
2019
Microvascular decompression for the treatment of neurogenic hypertension with trigeminal neuralgia.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 341
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke in Hubei, China: a survey of thrombolysis rate and barriers.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 202
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Machine learning analysis of motor evoked potential time series to predict disability progression in multiple sclerosis - BMC Neurology
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
228 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction to: Analysis of cardiac monitoring and safety data in patients initiating fingolimod treatment in the home or in clinic.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 336
232 views DOI Abstract
2019
Microvascular decompression for the treatment of neurogenic hypertension with trigeminal neuralgia.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 341
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
The protocol-guided rapid evaluation of veterans experiencing new transient neurological symptoms (PREVENT) quality improvement program: rationale and methods.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 294
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
COGTIPS: a double-blind randomized active controlled trial protocol to study the effect of home-based, online cognitive training on cognition and brain networks in Parkinson's disease.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 179
480 views DOI Abstract
2019
Irreversible fatal contrast-induced encephalopathy: a case report
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
434 views Abstract
2019
Intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke in Hubei, China: a survey of thrombolysis rate and barriers.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 202
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
THK5351 and flortaucipir PET with pathological correlation in a Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease patient: a case report.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 211
275 views DOI Abstract
2019
Autism, spectrum or clusters? An EEG coherence study.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 27
248 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,282 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

51.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

60.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.