Indexed in Journament

Preventive medicine reports

ISSN 2211-3355· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,051 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
23 Articles
Scores higher than 55.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Prev Med Rep
Abbreviated Name prev med rep
ISSN 2211-3355
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/preventive-medicine-reports

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Preventive medicine reports
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 11.1 20.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.1
Content Distribution 73.5 88.8
Content Quality 55.1
Ethics & Transparency 40.5
Editorial Standards 33.0
Publication Regularity 52.9
Geographic Reach 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (23)

2017
The global burden of child burn injuries in light of country level economic development and income inequality.
Vol. 6 , pp. 115-120
486 views DOI Abstract
2019
Are social inequalities in influenza vaccination coverage in Japan reduced by health policy?
Vol. 16 , pp. 100959
462 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rural-urban disparities in tobacco retail access in the southeastern United States: CVS vs. the dollar stores.
Vol. 15 , pp. 100935
457 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of physical activity recommendations on mindset, behavior and perceived health.
Vol. 17 , pp. 101027
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is enrollment in a Medicaid health maintenance organization associated with less preventable hospitalizations?
Vol. 16 , pp. 100964
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gender differences in the association between modifiable risk factors and financial hardship among middle-aged and older adults.
Vol. 16 , pp. 100962
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Youth source of acquisition for E-Cigarettes.
Vol. 16 , pp. 101011
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adolescent media use and its association to wellbeing in a Canadian national sample
Vol. 14 , pp. -
378 views Abstract
2020
Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity locations and behaviors in adults living in the United States.
Vol. 20 , pp. 101241
202 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of physical activity recommendations on mindset, behavior and perceived health.
Vol. 17 , pp. 101027
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dietary patterns among French-speaking men residing in Montreal, Canada
Vol. 13 , pp. 205-213
116 views Abstract
2019
Youth source of acquisition for E-Cigarettes.
Vol. 16 , pp. 101011
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Calibration and validation of accelerometry to measure physical activity in adult clinical groups: A systematic review.
Vol. 16 , pp. 101001
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Smoking cessation behaviors among older U.S. adults
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
202 views DOI
Journament Score
31.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,051 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.