Clinical orthopaedics and related research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1533 / 33,973
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Clinical orthopaedics and related research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Clin Orthop Relat Res
Abbreviated Name clin orthop relat res
ISSN 1528-1132
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.clinorthop.org/index.html
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2018
Is Use of a Psychological Workbook Associated With Improved Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scores in Patients With Distal Radius Fracture?
Goudie, Stuart;Dixon, Diane;McMillan, Gail;Ring, David;McQueen, Margaret;
Vol. 476 , No. 4 , pp. 832-845
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
A High Proportion of Patients Have Unfulfilled Sexual Expectations After TKA: A Prospective Study.
Harmsen, Rita Th E;Haanstra, Tsjitske M;Den Oudsten, Brenda L;Putter, Hein;Elzevier, Henk W;Gademan, Maaike G J;Nelissen, Rob G H H;, ;
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
What Are the Implications of Alternative Alpha Thresholds for Hypothesis Testing in Orthopaedics?
Landy, David C;Utset-Ward, Thomas J;Lee, Michael J;
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
What Proportion of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs Have Accessible Parental Leave Policies, and How Generous are They?
Siljander, Breana R;Van Nortwick, Sara S;Flakne, Jessica C;Van Heest, Ann E;Bohn, Deborah C;
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Does the Proportion of Women in Orthopaedic Leadership Roles Reflect the Gender Composition of Specialty Societies?
Saxena, Sharul;Cannada, Lisa K;Weiss, Jennifer M;
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Depression and Non-modifiable Patient Factors Associated with Patient Satisfaction in an Academic Orthopaedic Outpatient Clinic: Is it More Than a Provider Issue?
Tisano, Breann K;Nakonezny, Paul A;Gross, Bruno S;Martinez, J Riley;Wells, Joel E;
342 views DOI Abstract
1999
Histologic analysis of tissue after failed cartilage repair procedures
Nehrer S;Spector M;Minas T;;
, No. 365 , pp. -
293 views Abstract
2019
Has the Use of Fixation Techniques in THA Changed in This Decade? The Uncemented Paradox Revisited.
Bunyoz, Kristine Ifigenia;Malchau, Erik;Malchau, Henrik;Troelsen, Anders;
271 views DOI Abstract
2014
Letter to the Editor: Can Internet Information on Vertebroplasty be a Reliable Means of Patient Self-education?
Tin, S.
Vol. 472 , pp. 4042
214 views DOI
2023
Not the Last Word: ChatGPT Can't Perform Orthopaedic Surgery.
Bernstein, Joseph;
157 views DOI
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.