archaeologies | Journament

Journal Ranking

#245 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

archaeologies

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name archaeologies
Abbreviated Name archaeologies
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/11759
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2015
wind and wave setup contributions to extreme sea levels at a tropical high island: a stochastic cyclone simulation study for apia, samoa
;Ron Karl Hoeke;Kathleen L. McInnes;Julian G. O’Grady
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 1117-1135
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Empowering Tribal Youth in Cultural Heritage Management: A Case Study from the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska
Guilfoyle D.
Vol. 15 , pp. 42-63
340 views DOI
2018
in vitro inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, alphaglucosidase, and xanthine oxidase by bacteria extracts from coral reef in hainan, south china sea
;Lin Tan;Suxia Guo;Funing Ma;Chen Chang;Isabel Gómez-Betancur
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 33-
325 views DOI Abstract
2018
antimacrofouling efficacy of innovative inorganic nanomaterials loaded with booster biocides
;Eldad Gutner-Hoch;Roberto Martins;Tania Oliveira;Frederico Maia;Amadeu M. V. M. Soares;Susana Loureiro;Chen Piller;Iris Preiss;Michal Weis;Severine B. Larroze;Tania Teixeira;João Tedim;Yehuda Benayahu
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
278 views DOI Abstract
2016
recent advances in the study of marine microbial biofilm: from the involvement of quorum sensing in its production up to biotechnological application of the polysaccharide fractions
;Paola Di Donato;Annarita Poli;Valentina Taurisano;Gennaro Roberto Abbamondi;Barbara Nicolaus;Giuseppina Tommonaro
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 34-
272 views DOI Abstract
2015
channel shallowing as mitigation of coastal flooding
;Philip M. Orton;Stefan A. Talke;David A. Jay;Larry Yin;Alan F. Blumberg;Nickitas Georgas;Haihong Zhao;Hugh J. Roberts;Kytt MacManus
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 654-673
263 views DOI Abstract
2015
exploring water level sensitivity for metropolitan new york during sandy (2012) using ensemble storm surge simulations
;Brian A. Colle;Malcolm J. Bowman;Keith J. Roberts;M. Hamish Bowman;Charles N. Flagg;Jian Kuang;Yonghui Weng;Erin B. Munsell;Fuqing Zhang
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 428-443
263 views DOI Abstract
2018
storm surge and wave impact of low-probability hurricanes on the lower delaware bay—calibration and application
;Mehrdad Salehi
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 54-
262 views DOI Abstract
2018
potential impacts of sea level rise and coarse scale marsh migration on storm surge hydrodynamics and waves on coastal protected areas in the chesapeake bay
;Alayna Bigalbal;Ali M. Rezaie;Juan L. Garzon;Celso M. Ferreira
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 86-
260 views DOI Abstract
2013
measurement of diurnal body tilt angle distributions of threeline grunt parapristipoma trilineatum using micro-acceleration data loggers
;Hideaki Tanoue;Teruhisa Komatsu;Alabsi Natheer;Isamu Mitani;Shinichi Watanabe;Yuuki Watanabe;Akira Hamano;Nobuyuki Miyazaki
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 3-9
240 views DOI Abstract
View All 29 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.