isprs annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7437 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

isprs annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name isprs annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Abbreviated Name isprs annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (42 total)

2017
AUTOMATIC 3D BUILDING MODEL GENERATIONS WITH AIRBORNE LiDAR DATA
Yastikli, N.;Cetin, Z.;
Vol. IV-4-W4 , pp. 411-414
455 views Abstract
2019
From the elaboration process of point cloud to information systems both for planning and design management of cultural heritage
Ruffino P.
Vol. 42 , pp. 1031-1038
454 views DOI
2013
Robust Locally Weighted Regression For Ground Surface Extraction In Mobile Laser Scanning 3D Data
Nurunnabi, A.;West, G.;Belton, D.;
Vol. II-5-W2 , pp. 217-222
453 views Abstract
2019
A Geodatabase for Multisource Data Management Applied to Cultural Heritage: The Case Study of Villa Buonaccorsi's Historical Garden
Malinverni E.
Vol. 42 , pp. 771-776
417 views DOI
2019
ANALYZING THE IMPACTS OF LAND COVER CHANGE TO THE HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC BEHAVIOURS OF THE PHILIPPINES' THIRD LARGEST RIVER BASIN
Santillan, J. R.;Santillan, J. R.;Amora, A. M.;Makinano-Santillan, M.;Makinano-Santillan, M.;Gingo, A. L.;Marqueso, J. T.;
Vol. IV-3-W1 , pp. 41-48
403 views Abstract
2019
Environmental microclimate management and risk in the unesco world heritage site of villa barbaro maser (Italy)
Bonora A.
Vol. 42 , pp. 269-276
387 views DOI
2019
Management of 20th century hydroelectric plants as industrial heritage
Kuban N.
Vol. 42 , pp. 685-692
383 views DOI
2019
BIM process, ontologies and interchange platform for cultural architectural heritage management: State of art and development perspectives
Pili A.
Vol. 42 , pp. 969-973
382 views DOI
2019
DESCRIBING the VERTICAL STRUCTURE of INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS on the BASIS of LIDAR DATA - A CASE STUDY for FAVELAS (SLUMS) in SAO PAULO CITY
Ribeiro, S.
Vol. 4 , pp. 437-444
373 views DOI
2019
New tools for cultural heritage tourism: Accessible virtual reality for milan's basilica sant'ambrogio
Pybus, C.
Vol. 42 , pp. 1003-1010
364 views DOI
View All 42 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.